The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The patient safety culture: a systematic review by characteristics of Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture dimensions
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To learn the weaknesses and strengths of safety culture as expressed by the dimensions measured by the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) at hospitals in the various cultural contexts. The aim of this study was to identify studies that have used the HSOPSC to collect data on safety culture at hospitals; to survey their findings in the safety culture dimensions and possible contributions to improving the quality and safety of hospital care. DATA SOURCES: Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science and Scopus were searched from 2005 to July 2016 in English, Portuguese and Spanish. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were identified using specific search terms and inclusion criteria. A total of 33 articles, reporting on 21 countries, was included. DATA EXTRACTION: Scores were extracted by patient safety culture dimensions assessed by the HSOPSC. The quality of the studies was evaluated by the STROBE Statement. RESULTS: The dimensions that proved strongest were 'Teamwork within units' and 'Organisational learning-continuous improvement'. Particularly weak dimensions were 'Non-punitive response to error', 'Staffing', 'Handoffs and transitions' and 'Teamwork across units'. CONCLUSION: The studies revealed a predominance of hospital organisational cultures that were underdeveloped or weak as regards patient safety. For them to be effective, safety culture evaluation should be tied to strategies designed to develop safety culture hospital-wide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
Aiken, L. H., Sermeus, W., Van den Heede, K., Sloane, D. M., Busse, R., McKee, M., Bruyneel, L., Rafferty, A. M., Griffiths, P., Moreno-Casbas, M. T., et al. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e1717 · Cited by 2,052
Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: A review of the literature
MANSER, T. (2009) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.x · Cited by 1,322
Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations
Nieva, V. F. (2003) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii17 · Cited by 1,003
Iniciativa STROBE: subsídios para a comunicação de estudos observacionais
Malta, M., Cardoso, L. O., Bastos, F. I., Magnanini, M. M. F., & Silva, C. M. F. P. D. (2010) · Revista de Saúde Pública · doi:10.1590/s0034-89102010000300021 · Cited by 912
Measuring patient safety climate: a review of surveys
Colla, J. B. (2005) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.014217 · Cited by 648
Measuring safety climate in health care
Flin, R. (2006) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.014761 · Cited by 465
The structure of employee attitudes to safety: A European example
Cox, S., & Cox, T. (1991) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678379108257007 · Cited by 450
Hospital survey on patient safety culture in China
Nie, Y., Mao, X., Cui, H., He, S., Li, J., & Zhang, M. (2013) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-228 · Cited by 421
Cited by
Simsekler, M. C. E., Rodrigues, C., Qazi, A., Ellahham, S., & Ozonoff, A. (2021) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2020.107416 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Reis, C. T., Paiva, S. G., & Sousa, P.
- Venue
- International Journal for Quality in Health Care
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-05-17
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 660-677
- ISSN
- 1353-4505 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3677
- OpenAlex
- W2804877181
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The patient safety culture: a systematic review by characteristics of Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture dimensions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/intqhc/mzy080
- The paper
- Reis, C. T., Paiva, S. G., & Sousa, P. (2018). The patient safety culture: a systematic review by characteristics of Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture dimensions. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.