Cited by 47Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchDental Research and COVID-19

Specialty COPD care during COVID-19: patient and clinician perspectives on remote delivery

Open access
Wu, Frances, Burt, Jenni, Chowdhury, Teena, Fitzpatrick, Raymond, Martin, Graham, van der Scheer, Jan W, Hurst, John R·2021·BMJ Open Respiratory Research

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted specialty chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care. We examined the degree to which care has moved to remote approaches, eliciting clinician and patient perspectives on what is appropriate for ongoing remote delivery. Methods: Using an online research platform, we conducted a survey and consensus-building process involving clinicians and patients with COPD. Results: Fifty-five clinicians and 19 patients responded. The majority of clinicians felt able to assess symptom severity (n=52, 95%), reinforce smoking cessation (n=46, 84%) and signpost to other healthcare resources (n=44, 80%). Patients reported that assessing COPD severity and starting new medications were being addressed through remote care. Forty-three and 31 respondents participated in the first and second consensus-building rounds, respectively. When asked to rate the appropriateness of using remote delivery for specific care activities, respondents reached consensus on 5 of 14 items: collecting information about COPD and overall health status (77%), providing COPD education and developing a self-management plan (74%), reinforcing smoking cessation (81%), deciding whether patients should seek in-person care (72%) and initiating a rescue pack (76%). Conclusion: Adoption of remote care delivery appears high, with many care activities partially or completely delivered remotely. Our work identifies strengths and limitations of remote care delivery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000817

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]Telehealth FM Telehealth: Gu D, Dupre ME, Encyclopedia of gerontology and population health. Heidelberg: Springer, 2019.
  2. [12]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence COVID-19 rapid guideline: community-based care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). London: NICE, 2020 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng168 33439588

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, F., Burt, J., Chowdhury, T., Fitzpatrick, R., Martin, G., van der Scheer, J. W., & Hurst, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Royal College of Physicians (GB)
  • Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
  • The Healthcare Improvement Studies (THIS) Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Hurst, John R
Venue
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
e000817
ISSN
2052-4439 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3119103658
Cited by
45
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11
FWCI
9.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open Respiratory Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Apollo
Funders
The Health Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COVID-19 pandemic, remote care, telemedicine, clinician perspectives, patient perspectives, smoking cessation, COPD self-management, COPD education, symptom severity assessment, rescue medication, consensus building
MeSH terms
Self-Management, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Health, Delivery of Health Care, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurses, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Smoking Cessation, Telemedicine, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Practice Patterns, Nurses', Physical Therapists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review