Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 92Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesInnovations in Medical EducationPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Teaching general practitioners and doctors-in-training to discuss advance care planning: evaluation of a brief multimodality education programme

Open access

Abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate an interactive advance care planning (ACP) educational programme for general practitioners and doctors-in-training. Design: Development of training materials was overseen by a committee; informed by literature and previous teaching experience. The evaluation assessed participant confidence, knowledge and attitude toward ACP before and after training. Setting: Training provided to metropolitan and rural settings in Victoria, Australia. Participants: 148 doctors participated in training. The majority were aged at least 40 years with more than 10 years work experience; 63% had not trained in Australia. Intervention: The programme included prereading, a DVD, interactive patient e-simulation workshop and a training manual. All educational materials followed an evidence-based stepwise approach to ACP: Introducing the topic, exploring concepts, introducing solutions and summarising the conversation. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the change in doctors’ self-reported confidence to undertake ACP conversations. Secondary measures included pretest/post-test scores in patient ACP e-simulation, change in ACP knowledge and attitude, and satisfaction with programme materials. Results: 69 participants completed the preworkshop and postworkshop evaluation. Following education, there was a significant change in self-reported confidence in six of eight items (p=0.008 –0.08). There was a significant improvement (p<0.001) in median scores on the e-simulation (pre 7/80, post 60/80). There were no significant differences observed in ACP knowledge following training, and most participants were supportive of patient autonomy and ACP pretraining. Educational materials were rated highly. Conclusions: A short multimodal interactive education programme improves doctors’ confidence with ACP and performance on an ACP patient e-simulation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000450

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00215.x · DOI

Cited by

See all 92

Metadata

Authors
Detering, K., Silvester, W., Corke, C., Milnes, S., Fullam, R., Lewis, V., & Renton, J.
Affiliations
  • Austin Hospital (AU)
  • Austin Health (AU)
  • Barwon Health (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Detering, Karen
Venue
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-05-20
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
313-321
ISSN
  • 2045-435X (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-4368
OpenAlex
W2129084755
Cited by
92
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
advance care planning, physician training, general practitioners, doctors in training, physician-patient communication, self-reported confidence, patient autonomy, end-of-life care
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Male, Physician-Patient Relations, Terminal Care, Patient Simulation, Advance Care Planning, Young Adult, General Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teaching general practitioners and doctors-in-training to discuss advance care planning: evaluation of a brief multimodality education programme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000450
The paper
Detering, K., Silvester, W., Corke, C., Milnes, S., Fullam, R., Lewis, V., & Renton, J. (2014). Teaching general practitioners and doctors-in-training to discuss advance care planning: evaluation of a brief multimodality education programme. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000450

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.