Cited by 2,788Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CarePatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Associations Between End-of-Life Discussions, Patient Mental Health, Medical Care Near Death, and Caregiver Bereavement Adjustment

Open access
Wright, Alexi A.·2008·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Talking about death can be difficult. Without evidence that end-of-life discussions improve patient outcomes, physicians must balance their desire to honor patient autonomy against a concern of inflicting psychological harm. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether end-of-life discussions with physicians are associated with fewer aggressive interventions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A US multisite, prospective, longitudinal cohort study of patients with advanced cancer and their informal caregivers (n = 332 dyads), September 2002-February 2008. Patients were followed up from enrollment to death, a median of 4.4 months later. Bereaved caregivers' psychiatric illness and quality of life was assessed a median of 6.5 months later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Aggressive medical care (eg, ventilation, resuscitation) and hospice in the final week of life. Secondary outcomes included patients' mental health and caregivers' bereavement adjustment. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three of 332 (37.0%) patients reported having end-of-life discussions before baseline. Such discussions were not associated with higher rates of major depressive disorder (8.3% vs 5.8%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-3.32), or more worry (mean McGill score, 6.5 vs 7.0; P = .19). After propensity-score weighted adjustment, end-of-life discussions were associated with lower rates of ventilation (1.6% vs 11.0%; adjusted OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.83), resuscitation (0.8% vs 6.7%; adjusted OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.80), ICU admission (4.1% vs 12.4%; adjusted OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14-0.90), and earlier hospice enrollment (65.6% vs 44.5%; adjusted OR, 1.65;95% CI, 1.04-2.63). In adjusted analyses, more aggressive medical care was associated with worse patient quality of life (6.4 vs 4.6; F = 3.61, P = .01) and higher risk of major depressive disorder in bereaved caregivers (adjusted OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.12-10.13), whereas longer hospice stays were associated with better patient quality of life (mean score, 5.6 vs 6.9; F = 3.70, P = .01). Better patient quality of life was associated with better caregiver quality of life at follow-up (beta = .20; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: End-of-life discussions are associated with less aggressive medical care near death and earlier hospice referrals. Aggressive care is associated with worse patient quality of life and worse bereavement adjustment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.300.14.1665

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 18 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Caregivers of patients with high quality of life felt better prepared for the death.

    “Caregivers of patients with high QoL felt better prepared for the death (β=0.23, p=0.002)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Caregiver report accurately reflects the patient's quality of life near death.
  • Findingown data

    Patients who reported end-of-life discussions had lower performance status than those who did not.

    “Patients reporting discussions had lower performance status (59.5 vs. 65.7; p=0.003)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Longer hospice stays were linked to better patient quality of life near death.

    “while longer hospice stays were associated with better patient QoL (5.6 vs. 6.9; F=3.70, p=0.01)”
    • Also stated in: § Patients’ Quality of Life at EOL · plain
      “The inverse was true for hospice care, where patients’ QoL improved the longer they were enrolled, except for patients who received less than one week of services.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Caregiver report accurately reflects the patient's quality of life near death.
  • Findingown data

    Caregivers of patients who received any aggressive care were more likely to feel unprepared for the patient's death.

    “Caregivers of patients who received any aggressive care were at higher risk for developing a Major Depressive Disorder (AOR 3.37, 95% CI 1.12-10.13), experiencing regret (β=0.17; p=0.01), and feeling unprepared for the patient’s death (β=−0.30; p<0.001)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    High patient quality of life was linked to improvements in caregivers' self-rated change in health.

    “improvements in self-rated change in health (AOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05, 1.29)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Caregiver report accurately reflects the patient's quality of life near death.
  • May combine two claims. 6
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Patients who received no aggressive care had a mean quality-of-life score of 6.4, while those who received three or more aggressive therapies had a mean score of 4.6.

    “Patients who received no aggressive care had a mean QoL score of 6.4, while patients who received 3 or more therapies had a mean QoL score of 4.6 (F=3.61, df=3, p=0.01).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Caregiver report accurately reflects the patient's quality of life near death.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Patients with no hospice had a mean quality-of-life score of 5.6; those with one week or less also scored 5.6; those with two months or more scored 6.9.

    “Patients who did not receive hospice had a mean QoL score of 5.6; those enrolled for one week or less had a QoL score of 5.6; and those enrolled for 2 months or more had QoL scores of 6.9 (F=4.04, df=3, p=0.008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Caregiver report accurately reflects the patient's quality of life near death.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study was observational and could not randomize terminally ill cancer patients to end-of-life discussions for ethical and logistical reasons.

    “Our findings must be interpreted within the context of an observational study that could not randomize terminally ill cancer patients to EOL discussions for ethical and logistical reasons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study did not include interviews with doctors or audio-taped conversations.

    “Our study did not include interviews with doctors or audio-taped conversations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Propensity-score weighting is among the most robust available statistical methods for correcting potential selection bias and confounding.

    “it is one of the most robust statistical methods available to correct for potential selection bias and confounding.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Physicians often avoid end-of-life conversations, communicate euphemistically, are overly optimistic, or delay discussions until patients are close to death.

    “Physicians also often avoid EOL conversations, communicate euphemistically, are overly optimistic, or delay discussions until patients are close to death, perhaps because their own feelings of failure or loss.4,5,10,13,48,49”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [4]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [5]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [10]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [13]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [48]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [49]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    End-of-life discussions may make patients more realistic about the benefits of aggressive therapies, thereby reducing the likelihood of intensive treatments near death.

    “EOL discussions may make patients more realistic about the benefits of aggressive therapies, and thereby reduce the likelihood that they receive intensive treatments near death.15,43”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [15]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [43]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Patient self-report accurately identifies whether an end-of-life discussion occurred.
7 of 7
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Patient self-report accurately identifies whether an end-of-life discussion occurred.

    “Absent such independent validation, the accuracy of patients’ reported rates of discussions remains unknown”
    “we do not know who initiated the conversation, when it happened, or what was said.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Caregiver report accurately reflects the patient's quality of life near death.

    “In a post-mortem interview, research staff interviewed the formal/informal caregiver involved in the patients’ care during the final week of life to assess the patient’s QoL near death.”
    “source of report for patient QoL”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with advanced cancer commonly misunderstand their prognosis, and such misunderstandings are linked to more futile treatment.

    “Misunderstandings about prognosis are common16, 17, 18 and are associated with increased exposure to futile treatments.19, 20, 21, 22”

    From 5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5) (2020) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says cancer patients frequently misunderstand or fail to recall prognostic discussions. The Results (Medical care at the end-of-life; page unavailable) associate reported end-of-life discussions with fewer aggressive interventions near death, but the study does not establish that prognostic misunderstandings themselves are associated with greater exposure to treatment, or characterize those treatments as futile. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Advance care planning has been associated with earlier and increased use of hospice care, reduced intensive treatment and hospitalizations at the end of life, and better quality of life in patients with cancer and caregivers.

    “Advance care planning has been associated with earlier and increased use of hospice care [12–15], reduced intensive treatment and hospitalizations at the end of life [13, 15–18], and better quality of life in patients with cancer and caregivers [12, 19].”

    From Mindfulness to enhance quality of life and support advance care planning: a pilot randomized controlled trial for adults with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. (2024) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Results ('Medical care at the end-of-life'; page not supplied) associate end-of-life discussions with longer outpatient hospice enrollment and fewer intensive interventions, including ICU admissions. The Results ('Patients’ Quality of Life at EOL' and 'Bereavement Outcomes'; pages not supplied) link less aggressive care and longer hospice stays to better patient quality of life, and better patient quality of life to better caregiver outcomes. The paper does not establish reduced hospitalizations generally or directly associate the discussions with better quality of life for both patients and caregivers. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Even though survival after starting dialysis is known to be poor, advance care planning is uncommon.

    “Despite knowledge of poor survival after dialysis initiation, advance care planning occurs infrequently [9,10].”
  • Patients want prognostic information and advance care planning, but these happen rarely.

    “Delivery of prognostic information and advance care planning are desired by patients, but occur infrequently.”
  • ESRD patients who discuss end-of-life care with a clinician are more likely to complete advance directives.

    “ESRD patients who have end-of-life discussions with a healthcare provider are more likely to complete advance directives [9,10].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Hospice-quality-of-life test statistics differ

    Minor

    For the hospice-stay comparison using quality-of-life scores of 5.6 and 6.9, the abstract reports F=3.70 and p=0.01, while the results report F=4.04 and p=0.008.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, A. A.
Affiliations
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Wright, Alexi A.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2008-10-08
Volume
300
Issue
14
Pages
1665
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2137401089
Cited by
2,788
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 152 · 2023: 167 · 2022: 186 · 2021: 221 · 2020: 215 · 2019: 225 · 2018: 178 · 2017: 207 · 2016: 179 · 2015: 159 · 2014: 143 · 2013: 136 · 2012: 110
FWCI
84.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • McGill University
  • National Institute on Aging (K24AG033640)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-63892, R01MH063892)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA106370, CA106370, CA 92044343, T32CA009172)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
end-of-life discussions, advance care planning, mechanical ventilation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, hospice enrollment, advanced cancer, patient mental health, major depressive disorder, informal caregivers, quality of life, intensive care unit admission, physician-patient communication, patient autonomy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Attitude to Death, Bereavement, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Physician-Patient Relations, Physician's Role, Quality of Life, Resuscitation, Terminal Care, Caregivers, Hospice Care, Terminally Ill, Advance Care Planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review