Cited by 64Simulation-Based Education in HealthcarePatient Safety and Medication ErrorsSurgical Simulation and Training

In situ simulation as a tool for patient safety: a systematic review identifying how it is used and its effectiveness

Open access
Fent, Graham, Blythe, James, Farooq, Omer, Purva, Makani·2015·BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning

Abstract

Background: In situ simulation is an emerging technique involving interdisciplinary teams working through simulated scenarios which replicate events encountered in healthcare institutions, particularly those which are either low frequency or associated with high risk to patients. Since it takes place in the clinical environment, it is ideally suited to improving patient safety outcomes. Objective: To identify and appraise all studies assessing contribution of in situ simulation to patient safety, identify gaps in knowledge and areas for future research, as well as suggesting strategies for maximising its impact on patient safety within an institution. Study selection: Three electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE) as well as the Cochrane Library were searched for articles relating to patient safety outcomes in in situ simulation. In addition a subject expert was approached to suggest any additional articles not identified by electronic searches. A total of 1795 abstracts were identified and screened, 35 full articles assessed for eligibility for inclusion and a total of 18 full articles included in the review after unsuitable articles were excluded. Conclusions: In situ simulation can improve real-life patient safety outcomes, with 2 studies demonstrating improved morbidity and mortality outcomes following initiation of in situ simulation. There is good evidence to suggest that its implementation leads to improved clinical skills, teamwork and observed behaviours. Additionally, it is ideally suited to detecting latent safety errors (errors identified within a scenario which, if they had occurred in real life, could have led to a degree of harm occurring to a patient).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000065

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fent, G., Blythe, J., Farooq, O., & Purva, M.
Affiliations
Hull Royal Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Fent, Graham
Venue
BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-11-09
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
103-110
ISSN
2056-6697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2174473982
Cited by
64
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
in situ simulation, patient safety, simulation-based training, interdisciplinary teams, teamwork, clinical skills, morbidity and mortality, healthcare quality improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review