Reported loneliness rather than social isolation is a risk factor for 10-year mortality in older men
Abstract
QUESTION Question: Do social isolation factors and feelings of loneliness predict an increased risk of mortality in older people, and does this relationship differ between men and women? Population: 4004 city of Amsterdam residents aged between 65 and 84 years from the Amsterdam Study of the Elderly (AMSTEL). Participants were randomly selected from four age categories consisting of 5-year brackets and were representative of Amsterdam’s elderly population. Structured interviews were conducted in each resident’s home by trained and supervised interviewers. Setting: Amsterdam city, The Netherlands; 1991–2001. Prognostic factors: Feelings of loneliness, defined in the structured interview as the experience or subjective feeling of loneliness by the participant when asked the question ‘do you feel lonely?’. Social isolation, defined as either a lack of social support (assessed by asking participants if they had help from family, neighbours or home support), or being no longer married, single or living alone. Potential confounders were assessed in the structured interview at baseline including psychiatric disorders, medical disorders and conditions, smoking and drinking behaviours, cognitive functioning and functional status and demographic characteristics including education. Associations between social isolation, feelings of loneliness and mortality were calculated using Cox proportional hazard regression models after controlling for potential confounders. Interactions between feelings of loneliness and gender were also calculated and included in the regression model. Outcomes: Death (identified through linkage with local registries). METHODS Design: Prospective cohort study. Follow-up period: Average 9.8 years. MAIN RESULTS At baseline, more women (27.4%) reported feelings of loneliness than men (12%; p<0.001). Women were also more socially isolated in terms of being single or no longer married and living alone (p<0.001) but did receive more social support than men (p<0.001). At 10 years’ follow-up, 53% of participants had died (60.8% of men and 47.2% of women). The death rate was higher in men reporting feelings of loneliness at baseline (78.9%) compared to women reporting loneliness (53.9%). The death rate was also higher for men with social isolation than women with social isolation. Following adjustment for social isolation and other identified confounders, reporting feelings of loneliness was associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality in men (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.63), but not women (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.24). Following adjustment, no higher risk of mortality was found in men or women reporting social isolation. CONCLUSIONS Reporting feelings of loneliness is associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality in the next 10 years in older men, but not older women. This relationship is independent of social isolation. Reporting social isolation is not an independent risk factor for mortality in the next 10 years in older men or women. NOTES Men and women differed significantly for most conditions at baseline. The severity and extent of loneliness were not determined. Feelings of loneliness and social support were identified at baseline only and the study did not account for changes in marital status, living arrangement, social network and feelings of loneliness throughout the 10-year follow-up.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Loneliness, independent of social network size, is associated with higher mortality.
“Consistent with this, loneliness—independent of social network size—is associated with higher mortality13,193 increased blood pressure11,194, higher rate of diabetes, hypertension, arthritis, emphysema195, and Alzheimer’s disease196, along with poor health habits stemming from a lack of self-control197,198.”
From Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis (2019) · cites this paper as [193]
Cites
Social Vulnerability, Frailty and Mortality in Elderly People
Andrew, M. K., Mitnitski, A. B., & Rockwood, K. J. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002232 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Self-citationHolwerda, T. J., Beekman, A. T. F., Deeg, D. J. H., Stek, M. L., van Tilburg, T. G., Visser, P. J., Schmand, B., Jonker, C., & Schoevers, R. A. (2012) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291711001772 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality: A Meta-Analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614568352 · Cited by 6,043 · see citing works
Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis
Matthews, G. A., & Tye, K. M. (2019) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14016 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
- Authors
- Andrew, M. K.
- Affiliations
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Melissa Kathryn Andrew
- Venue
- Evidence Based Mental Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2012-09-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 87-87
- ISSN
- 1362-0347 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-960X
- OpenAlex
- W2318488392
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evidence-Based Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- loneliness, social isolation, mortality, older men, sex differences, social support, living alone, widowhood, marital status, older adults, life expectancy, subjective well-being, cognitive function, functional status, mental illness, physical activity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review