Cited by 2Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Review: computerised CBT improves adult depression in the short-term, but its effect may have been overestimated previously

Helen M Christensen, Andrew James Mackinnon·2013·Evidence Based Mental Health

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/eb-2013-101404

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christensen, H. M., & Mackinnon, A. J.
Affiliations
Black Dog Institute (AU)
Venue
Evidence Based Mental Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-08-12
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
119-119
ISSN
  • 1362-0347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-960X
OpenAlex
W2000886621
Cited by
2
References
3
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evidence-Based Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
computerized cognitive behavioral therapy, adult depression, depression treatment, overestimation of treatment effects, short-term treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder, Humans, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review