CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reliance on self-reporting underestimates pregnancy smoking rates in Scotland, with more than 2400 pregnant smokers estimated to be missed each year

Tong, Van T, Dietz, Patricia M, England, Lucinda J·2010·Evidence Based Medicine
DOI 10.1136/ebm1053
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Commentary on: D Shipton, DM Tappin, T Vadiveloo, et al.. Reliability of self reported smoking status by pregnant women for estimating smoking prevalence: a retrospective, cross sectional study. BMJ2009;339:b4347.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ebm1053

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1136/bmj.b4347 · DOI
  2. Nichter M Greaves L Bloch M . Tobacco use and secondhand smoke exposure during pregnancy in low- and middle-income countries: the need for social and cultural research. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; Early Online, 1-13. · DOI
  3. Lumley J Chamberlain C Dowswell T . Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;3:CD001055. · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1080/14622200410001669141 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/aje/kwn301 · DOI
  6. 10.1124/jpet.301.2.594 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1080/14622200210123581 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Melvin, 2000, Measurement and definition for smoking cessation intervention research: the smoke-free families experience. Smoke-Free Families Common Evaluation Measures for Pregnancy and Smoking Cessation Projects Working Group, Tob Control, 9, III87, 10.1136/tc.9.suppl_3.iii87 · DOI
  9. 10.2105/AJPH.2008.144485 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tong, V. T., Dietz, P. M., & England, L. J.
Venue
Evidence Based Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2010-06
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
94-95
ISSN
  • 1356-5524
  • 1473-6810
DOI
10.1136/ebm1053
Cited by
4
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review