Cited by 10Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPhysical Activity and HealthDiabetes Management and Education

Structured diet and physical activity programmes provide strong evidence of effectiveness for type 2 diabetes prevention and improvement of cardiometabolic health

Pronk, Nicolaas P·2016·Evidence Based Medicine

Abstract

Commentary on : Balk EM, Earley A, Raman G, et al. Combined diet and physical activity promotion programs to prevent type 2 diabetes among persons at increased risk: a systematic review for the community preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 2015;163:437–51.[OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3] Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a significant and growing medical problem affecting close to 400 million people worldwide1 and almost 10% of the US population2 while imposing a major financial burden on society.3 Furthermore, an estimated 37% of the US adult population is at risk of T2DM, making primary prevention of T2DM a critical public health objective. Large clinical trials have shown that combined diet and physical activity promotion programmes … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DAnn%2BIntern%2BMed%26rft.volume%253D163%26rft.spage%253D437%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.7326%252FM15-0452%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F26167912%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.7326/M15-0452&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=26167912&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmed%2F21%2F1%2F18.atom

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ebmed-2015-110292

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pronk, N. P.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Pronk, Nicolaas P
Venue
Evidence Based Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-10-22
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
18-18
ISSN
  • 1356-5524 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-6810
OpenAlex
W2174377273
Cited by
10
References
2
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
type 2 diabetes prevention, physical activity programs, cardiometabolic health, vulnerable populations, primary prevention, community-based prevention, lifestyle intervention, diabetes prevention, glycemic control, cardiovascular risk reduction, weight loss, insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, lipid profile, HbA1c, community health workers, diabetes self-management education
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Reducing, Health Promotion, Humans, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review