Cited by 10,874Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Treatment and ManagementObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Changes in Lifestyle among Subjects with Impaired Glucose Tolerance

Open access
Tuomilehto, Jaakko, Lindström, Jaana, Eriksson, Johan G., Valle, Timo T., Hämäläinen, Helena, Ilanne-Parikka, Pirjo, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, Sirkka, Laakso, Mauri +11 more·2001·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is increasingly common, primarily because of increases in the prevalence of a sedentary lifestyle and obesity. Whether type 2 diabetes can be prevented by interventions that affect the lifestyles of subjects at high risk for the disease is not known. METHODS: We randomly assigned 522 middle-aged, overweight subjects (172 men and 350 women; mean age, 55 years; mean body-mass index [weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters], 31) with impaired glucose tolerance to either the intervention group or the control group. Each subject in the intervention group received individualized counseling aimed at reducing weight, total intake of fat, and intake of saturated fat and increasing intake of fiber and physical activity. An oral glucose-tolerance test was performed annually; the diagnosis of diabetes was confirmed by a second test. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.2 years. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) amount of weight lost between base line and the end of year 1 was 4.2+/-5.1 kg in the intervention group and 0.8+/-3.7 kg in the control group; the net loss by the end of year 2 was 3.5+/-5.5 kg in the intervention group and 0.8+/-4.4 kg in the control group (P<0.001 for both comparisons between the groups). The cumulative incidence of diabetes after four years was 11 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 6 to 15 percent) in the intervention group and 23 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 17 to 29 percent) in the control group. During the trial, the risk of diabetes was reduced by 58 percent (P<0.001) in the intervention group. The reduction in the incidence of diabetes was directly associated with changes in lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS: Type 2 diabetes can be prevented by changes in the lifestyles of high-risk subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200105033441801

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

2 of 5 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The cumulative incidence of diabetes after four years was 11 percent in the intervention group and 23 percent in the control group.

    “The cumulative incidence of diabetes after four years was 11 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 6 to 15 percent) in the intervention group and 23 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 17 to 29 percent) in the control group.”
    • Also stated in: § T ABLE 1. B ASE -L INE C HARACTERISTICS OF THE S UBJECTS IN THE I NTERVENTION AND C · plain
      “At four years, the cumulative incidence was 11 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 6 to 15 percent) in the intervention group and 23 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 17 to 29 percent) in the control group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    During the trial, the risk of diabetes was reduced by 58 percent in the intervention group compared with the control group.

    “During the trial, the risk of diabetes was reduced by 58 percent (P<0.001) in the intervention group.”
    • Also stated in: § T ABLE 1. B ASE -L INE C HARACTERISTICS OF THE S UBJECTS IN THE I NTERVENTION AND C · plain
      “the cumulative incidence of diabetes was 58 percent lower in the intervention group than in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.3 to 0.7; P<0.001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The reduction in the incidence of diabetes was directly associated with changes in lifestyle.

    “The reduction in the incidence of diabetes was directly associated with changes in lifestyle.”
    • Also stated in: § T ABLE 1. B ASE -L INE C HARACTERISTICS OF THE S UBJECTS IN THE I NTERVENTION AND C · boosted
      “There was a strong inverse correlation between the success score and the incidence of diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The success score computed from grades for intervention goals validly reflects the extent of lifestyle changes achieved.
  • Findingown data

    Diabetes had not developed in any of the subjects who reached four or five of the intervention goals.

    “Diabetes had not developed in any of the subjects who reached four or five of the goals (49 subjects in the intervention group and 15 in the control group).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The odds ratio for diabetes in intervention-group subjects who had lost more than 5 percent of their initial weight by the one-year follow-up visit was 0.3, as compared with those in the intervention group who had lost less weight or none at all.

    “According to a univariate analysis, the odds ratio for diabetes in subjects in the intervention group who had lost more than 5 percent of their initial weight by the one-year follow-up visit was 0.3 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.1 to 0.7) as compared with those in the intervention group who had lost less weight or none at all;”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 21
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The changes in lifestyle in our study not only improved glucose tolerance but also reduced the magnitude of several other cardiovascular risk factors.

    “The changes in lifestyle in our study not only improved glucose tolerance but also reduced the magnitude of several other cardiovascular risk factors.13”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Results from previous studies in Sweden and China also provide evidence that changes in lifestyle are effective in preventing diabetes, and the magnitude of the benefit in these studies was similar to that in this study.

    “The results from previous studies in Sweden 17 and China 18 also provide evidence that changes in lifestyle are effective in preventing diabetes, and the magnitude of the benefit in these studies was similar to that in our study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [17] source
    • cites [18] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The net weight loss by the end of year 2 was 3.5 kg in the intervention group and 0.8 kg in the control group.

    “the net loss by the end of year 2 was 3.5±5.5 kg in the intervention group and 0.8±4.4kg in the control group (P<0.001 for both comparisons between the groups).”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
      “At two years, the decrease in weight remained significantly greater in the intervention group (3.5±5.5 kg) than in the control group (0.8±4.4 kg) (P<0.001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The mean amount of weight lost between base line and the end of year 1 was 4.2 kg in the intervention group and 0.8 kg in the control group.

    “The mean (±SD) amount of weight lost be- tween base line and the end of year 1 was 4.2±5.1 kg in the intervention group and 0.8±3.7 kg in the control group”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
      “During the first year, the mean (±SD) body weight decreased by 4.2±5.1 kg (4.7±5.4 percent) in the intervention group and by 0.8±3.7 kg (0.9±4.2 percent) in the control group (P<0.001)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The incidence of diabetes was 63 percent lower among men in the intervention group and 54 percent lower among women.

    “The incidence of diabetes was 63 percent lower among men in the intervention group (95 percent confidence interval, 18 to 79 percent; P=0.01) and 54 percent lower among women (95 percent confidence interval, 26 to 81 percent; P=0.008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Waist circumference, fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour plasma glucose, and 2-hour serum insulin decreased significantly more in the intervention group than in the control group.

    “Waist circumference, the fasting plasma glucose concentration, the plasma glucose concentration two hours after oral glucose challenge, and the serum insulin concentration two hours after glucose challenge decreased significantly more among subjects in the intervention group than among those in the control group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The average proportion of subjects in whom impaired glucose tolerance progressed to diabetes was 3 percent per year in the intervention group and 6 percent per year in the control group.

    “The average proportion of subjects in whom impaired glucose tolerance progressed to diabetes was 3 percent per year in the intervention group and 6 percent per year in the control group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Diabetes was diagnosed in a total of 86 subjects: 27 in the intervention group and 59 in the control group.

    “Diabetes was diagnosed in a total of 86 subjects -27 in the intervention group and 59 in the control group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At two years, the mean change from base line in fasting plasma glucose was -2 mg per deciliter in the intervention group and +3 mg per deciliter in the control group.

    “At this time, the mean change from base line in the fasting plasma glucose concentration was -2±12 mg per deciliter (-0.1±0.7 mmol per liter) in the intervention group and +3±14 mg per deciliter (+0.2±0.8 mmol per liter) in the control group (P<0.001);”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    According to our results, 22 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance must be treated for one year-or 5 subjects for five years-to prevent one case of diabetes.

    “According to our results, 22 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance must be treated in this way for one year -or 5 subjects for five years -to prevent one case of diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The corresponding odds ratio for diabetes in the control group was 0.6.

    “the corresponding odds ratio in the control group was 0.6 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.3 to 1.1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The subjects in the intervention group were more likely to report changes in dietary and exercise habits than the control group.

    “The subjects in the intervention group were more likely to report changes in dietary and exercise habits.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported dietary and exercise habits accurately reflect actual lifestyle changes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The absolute incidence of diabetes was 32 cases per 1000 person-years in the intervention group and 78 per 1000 person-years in the control group.

    “The absolute incidence of diabetes was 32 cases per 1000 person-years in the intervention group and 78 per 1000 personyears in the control group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were significantly greater decreases in the intervention group than in the control group in 2-hour serum insulin, triglyceride concentration, and blood pressure.

    “There were also significantly greater decreases in the intervention group than in the control group in the serum insulin concentration two hours after oral glucose challenge, as well as in the triglyceride concentration and blood pressure (data not shown).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The diagnosis of diabetes required confirmation by a second oral glucose-tolerance test.

    “We required confirmation of the diagnosis of diabetes by a second oral glucose-tolerance test; if the diagnosis was not confirmed by the second test, the subject followed the program according to the original random assignment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The end-points committee excluded one subject who had diabetes at base line whose diagnosis of diabetes was confirmed at her two-year visit.

    “The end-points committee excluded one subject who had diabetes at base line whose diagnosis of diabetes was confirmed at her two-year visit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the National Public Health Institute in Helsinki, Finland, and all study subjects gave written informed consent.

    “The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the National Public Health Institute in Helsinki, Finland, and all the study subjects gave written informed consent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All analyses of end points were based on the intention-to-treat principle.

    “All analyses of end points were based on the intention-to-treat principle.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The reasonably low dropout rate in our study indicates that subjects with impaired glucose tolerance are willing and able to participate in a demanding intervention program if it is made available to them.

    “The reasonably low dropout rate in our study also indicates that subjects with impaired glucose tolerance are willing and able to participate in a demanding intervention program if it is made available to them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    In March 2000, an independent statistician completed the first analysis of data, and on the basis of the results the end-points committee recommended that the trial be ended.

    “In March 2000, an independent statistician completed the first analysis of data, which included all cases of diabetes diagnosed before that date.On the basis of the results of this analysis, the endpoints committee recommended that the trial be ended.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The independent end-points committee confirmed all newly diagnosed cases of diabetes.

    “The independent end-points committee confirmed all newly diagnosed cases of diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Subjects who withdrew from the study were considered to be at risk for diabetes until their last oral glucose-tolerance test, at which point data were censored.

    “Subjects who withdrew from the study were considered to be at risk for diabetes until their last oral glucosetolerance test, at which point data were censored.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Withdrawal from the study and censoring at the last oral glucose-tolerance test do not bias the estimated intervention effect.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Laboratory staff did not know the subjects' group assignments, and subjects were not informed of their plasma glucose concentrations during follow-up unless diabetes was diagnosed.

    “Laboratory staff did not know the subjects' group assignments, and the subjects were not informed of their plasma glucose concentrations during follow-up unless diabetes was diagnosed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study centers did not exchange information concerning the number of subjects who reached the end point, and end-point data were linked to group assignment only after a total of 80 subjects had reached the end point.

    “The study centers did not exchange information concerning the number of subjects who reached the end point, and the end-point data were linked to the group assignment at the study center only after a total of 80 subjects had reached the end point, as stated in the study plan.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Glucose measurements were standardized by the central laboratory in Helsinki, and linear-regression equations were used to correct locally measured plasma glucose values.

    “The glucose measurements were standardized by the central laboratory in Helsinki, whose staff analyzed 60 to 80 plasma samples from each center in duplicate.A linear-regression equation was calculated for each center, with the use of the plasma glucose measurement determined at the Helsinki laboratory as the standard.These equations were used to correct the locally measured plasma glucose values.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Subjects were randomly assigned to intervention or control by the study physician using a randomization list, with stratification according to center, sex, and mean plasma glucose two hours after oral glucose challenge.

    “Subjects who enrolled in the study were randomly assigned to the intervention group or the control group by the study physician, with the use of a randomization list, with stratification according to center, sex, and the mean plasma glucose concentration two hours after oral glucose challenge (140 to 169 mg per deciliter or 170 to 200 mg per deciliter [7.8 to 9.4 mmol per liter or 9.5 to 11.0 mmol”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study was only partly blinded because staff members involved in the intervention had to be aware of group assignment.

    “However, the staff members involved in the intervention had to be aware of the group assignment; thus, the study was only partly blinded.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    During the study, 40 subjects (8 percent) withdrew: 23 in the intervention group and 17 in the control group.

    “During the study, 40 subjects (8 percent) withdrew -23 in the intervention group and 17 in the control group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many patients with diabetes also have hypertension and an atherogenic serum lipid profile.

    “Many also have hypertension and an atherogenic serum lipid profile.[19][20][21][22]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19][20][21][22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

29 of 29
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The success score computed from grades for intervention goals validly reflects the extent of lifestyle changes achieved.

    “subjects were given a grade for each goal of the intervention at the one-year visit (with 0 indicating that it was not achieved or 1 indicating that it was achieved), and a success score was computed as the sum of these grades.”
    “At the one-year visit, each subject received a grade of 0 for each intervention goal that had not been achieved and a grade of 1 for each goal that had been achieved; the success score was computed as the sum of the grades.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Withdrawal from the study and censoring at the last oral glucose-tolerance test do not bias the estimated intervention effect.

    “Subjects who withdrew from the study were considered to be at risk for diabetes until their last oral glucosetolerance test, at which point data were censored.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The study subjects with impaired glucose tolerance are representative of the high-risk subjects to whom the prevention conclusion generalizes.

    “middle-aged, overweight subjects (172 men and 350 women; mean age, 55 years; mean body-mass index [weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters], 31) with impaired glucose tolerance”
    “high-risk subjects”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Self-reported dietary and exercise habits accurately reflect actual lifestyle changes.

    “The study subjects were asked about their healthrelated behavior at base line and subsequently at each annual follow-up examination (Table 3).”
    “They completed a three-day food diary at base line and at each annual visit, using a booklet illustrating the sizes of portions of food.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lifestyle interventions and weight loss reverse T2DM in early stages when insulin is still secreted, but patients may become dependent on anti-diabetic drugs in later stages.

    “Although lifestyle interventions393 and weight loss394 reverse T2DM in early stages, when insulin is still secreted, T2DM patients may become dependent on anti-diabetic drugs in later stages.”

    From Pancreatic regulation of glucose homeostasis. (2016) · cites this paper as [393]

    The Discussion reports that lifestyle changes prevented or postponed type 2 diabetes in people with impaired glucose tolerance. That supports a benefit from lifestyle intervention, but the participants did not have diagnosed diabetes, so the paper does not establish reversal of early-stage T2DM or link it to continued insulin secretion. The later claim about dependence on anti-diabetic drugs is not supported by these passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In four of the five clinical trials, diabetes rates decreased in relation to substantial reductions in body weight, whereas in the Indian trial lifestyle intervention was successful despite no weight loss.

    “In four of these studies ( 2 – 5 ), diabetes rates decreased in relation to substantial reductions in body weight, whereas in the Indian trial ( 6 ) lifestyle intervention was successful despite no weight loss.”

    From Reduction in the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes With the Mediterranean Diet (2011) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Results report greater weight loss and lower diabetes incidence in this trial's intervention group, supporting its inclusion among the four studies cited as (2–5). But the Discussion says the average weight loss was “not large,” so describing this trial's reduction as substantial overstates the source. The Indian trial is cited separately as (6) and is not attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lifestyle modification in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study and the U.S. Diabetes Prevention Program reduced incident diabetes by 58% and, in the DPP, had a greater effect than metformin (31%).

    “Lifestyle modification in both studies reduced incident diabetes by 58% and, in the DPP, had a greater effect than metformin (31%).”

    From Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes (2010) · cites this paper as [260]

    The Discussion (p. 1344–1345) reports that lifestyle intervention reduced diabetes incidence by 58% in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Our copy does not report results from the U.S. Diabetes Prevention Program or compare lifestyle intervention with metformin, so it does not support the DPP and 31% portions of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The most robust research available related to eating patterns for prediabetes or type 2 diabetes prevention are Mediterranean-style, low-fat, or low-carbohydrate eating plans.

    “The most robust research available related to eating patterns for prediabetes or type 2 diabetes prevention are Mediterranean-style, low-fat, or lowcarbohydrate eating plans (26,69,74,75).”

    From Nutrition Therapy for Adults With Diabetes or Prediabetes: A Consensus Report (2019) · cites this paper as [74]

    The Study Design describes a low-fat dietary goal as part of an intervention that also included weight loss, more fiber, and exercise. The Discussion reports reduced diabetes incidence with comprehensive lifestyle changes and says the study did not separate the effects of diet and exercise. It does not compare eating plans or establish which have the most robust evidence; Mediterranean-style and low-carbohydrate plans are not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Physical training can play a significant role in the prevention of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes.

    “In addition, physical training can play a significant role in the prevention of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes [22–25].”

    From Patients with type 2 diabetes have normal mitochondrial function in skeletal muscle (2007) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Discussion (page not provided) associates greater physical activity with lower diabetes risk, and the Results report fewer diabetes cases after an intervention that included exercise. The paper studied people with impaired glucose tolerance and did not establish that physical training alone prevents diabetes; it also does not report prevention of insulin resistance. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Serum insulin units differ between tables

    Minor

    Table 2 labels the change in serum insulin in mg/ml, while Table 1 reports serum insulin in mU/ml. A change from baseline should use the same units as the baseline measurement unless a conversion is stated.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Neel JV, 1962, Am J Hum Genet, 14, 353
  2. Tuomilehto J, Tuomilehto-Wolf E, Zimmet P, Alberti K, Knowler W. Primary prevention of diabetes mellitus. In: Alberti K, Zimmet P, DeFronzo R, Keen H, eds. International textbook of diabetes mellitus. Chichester, England: John Wiley, 1997:1799-827.
  3. 1994, WHO Tech Rep Ser, 844, 1
  4. 1985, WHO Tech Rep Ser, 727, 7

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuomilehto, J., Lindström, J., Eriksson, J. G., Valle, T. T., Hämäläinen, H., Ilanne-Parikka, P., Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, S., Laakso, M., Louheranta, A., Rastas, M., Salminen, V., Aunola, S., Cepaitis, Z., Moltchanov, V., Hakumäki, M., Mannelin, M., Martikkala, V., Sundvall, J., & Uusitupa, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Oulu (FI)
  • Social Insurance Institution (FI)
  • Oulu University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Oulu Deaconess Institute (FI)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2001-05-03
Volume
344
Issue
18
Pages
1343-1350
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2332951586
Cited by
10,873
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 152 · 2025: 198 · 2024: 256 · 2023: 223 · 2022: 289 · 2021: 341 · 2020: 346 · 2019: 336 · 2018: 430 · 2017: 402 · 2016: 441 · 2015: 476 · 2014: 549 · 2013: 566 · 2012: 553
FWCI
320.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
type 2 diabetes prevention, impaired glucose tolerance, lifestyle intervention, weight loss, nutrition counseling, saturated fat intake, dietary fiber, physical activity, overweight adults, diabetes incidence
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dietary Fiber, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk, Weight Loss, Exercise, Incidence, Glucose Intolerance, Diet, Fat-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review