Cited by 79Healthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationPsychiatric care and mental health services

Introducing artificial intelligence in acute psychiatric inpatient care: qualitative study of its use to conduct nursing observations

Open access
Barrera, Alvaro, Gee, Carol, Wood, Andrew, Gibson, Oliver, Bayley, Daniel, Geddes, John·2020·Evidence-Based Mental Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: All patients admitted to an acute inpatient mental health unit must have nursing observations carried out at night either hourly or every 15 minutes, to ascertain that they are safe and breathing. However, while this practice ensures patient safety, it can also disturb patients' sleep, which in turn can impact negatively on their recovery. OBJECTIVE: This article describes the process of introducing artificial intelligence ('digitally assisted nursing observations') in an acute mental health inpatient ward, to enable staff to carry out the hourly and the 15 minutes observations, minimising disruption of patients' sleep while maintaining their safety. FINDINGS: The preliminary data obtained indicate that the digitally assisted nursing observations agreed with the observations without sensors when both were carried out in parallel and that over an estimated 755 patient nights, the new system has not been associated with any untoward incidents. Preliminary qualitative data suggest that the new technology improves patients' and staff's experience at night. DISCUSSION: This project suggests that the digitally assisted nursing observations could maintain patients' safety while potentially improving patients' and staff's experience in an acute psychiatric ward. The limitations of this study, namely, its narrative character and the fact that patients were not randomised to the new technology, suggest taking the reported findings as qualitative and preliminary. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These results suggest that the care provided at night in acute inpatient psychiatric units could be substantially improved with this technology. This warrants a more thorough and stringent evaluation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300136

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Modernising the Mental Health Act. Increasing choice, reducing compulsion. final report of the independent review of the mental health act 1983, 2018.
  2. [8]State of Victoria, Department of Health. Nursing observation and the assessment and immediate management of suicide, self-harm, aggression and absconding risks in psychiatric inpatient units. A review of literature, 2013.
  3. [24]Ede J, Darbyshire J, Vallance D, et al. Non-Contact monitoring of vital signs in intensive care. Research in Clinical Practice conference, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrera, A., Gee, C., Wood, A., Gibson, O., Bayley, D., & Geddes, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • LIO (GB)
Venue
Evidence-Based Mental Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-02
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
34-38
ISSN
  • 1362-0347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-960X
OpenAlex
W3006635320
Cited by
79
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evidence-Based Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre (Part-time nursing research role (AW))
  • NIHR Oxford Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (Part-time nursing research role (AW))
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
artificial intelligence, nursing observation, acute psychiatric inpatient care, sleep disruption, digital health technologies, patient experience, employee experience, technology implementation
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Psychiatric Nursing, Observation, Qualitative Research, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review