Cited by 121Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Research TopicsImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Digital phenotyping for mental health of college students: a clinical review

Open access
Melcher, Jennifer, Hays, Ryan, Torous, John·2020·Evidence Based Mental Health

Abstract

Experiencing continued growth in demand for mental health services among students, colleges are seeking digital solutions to increase access to care as classes shift to remote virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using smartphones to capture real-time symptoms and behaviours related to mental illnesses, digital phenotyping offers a practical tool to help colleges remotely monitor and assess mental health and provide more customised and responsive care. This narrative review of 25 digital phenotyping studies with college students explored how this method has been deployed, studied and has impacted mental health outcomes. We found the average duration of studies to be 42 days and the average enrolled to be 81 participants. The most common sensor-based streams collected included location, accelerometer and social information and these were used to inform behaviours such as sleep, exercise and social interactions. 52% of the studies included also collected smartphone survey in some form and these were used to assess mood, anxiety and stress among many other outcomes. The collective focus on data that construct features related to sleep, activity and social interactions indicate that this field is already appropriately attentive to the primary drivers of mental health problems among college students. While the heterogeneity of the methods of these studies presents no reliable target for mobile devices to offer automated help—the feasibility across studies suggests the potential to use these data today towards personalising care. As more unified digital phenotyping research evolves and scales to larger sample sizes, student mental health centres may consider integrating these data into their clinical practice for college students.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300180

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • User research indicated that students do not like to be monitored and consider passive sensing tracking (eg, collection of location and acceleration data) as too invasive.

    “However, this was chosen because user research indicated that students do not like to be monitored and consider passive sensing tracking (eg, collection of location and acceleration data) as too invasive. This is in line with studies examining the acceptability of sensing technology among university students [110,111].”

    From Optimization of a Transdiagnostic Mobile Emotion Regulation Intervention for University Students: Protocol for a Microrandomized Trial (2023) · cites this paper as [110]

    The Passive data section reports privacy concerns about sharing social data, and the Discussion reports high unacceptability of keystroke data among college students. But the review does not say students generally dislike being monitored or consider location and accelerometer sensing too invasive; its Discussion instead describes digital phenotyping for college mental health as feasible and acceptable. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melcher, J., Hays, R., & Torous, J.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Torous, John
Venue
Evidence Based Mental Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-09-30
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
161-166
ISSN
  • 1362-0347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-960X
OpenAlex
W3091396385
Cited by
121
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 15
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evidence-Based Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
digital phenotyping, college student mental health, smartphone sensors, sleep, physical activity, social interaction, mood, anxiety, stress, COVID-19 remote learning, individualized care, student mental health services
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Biological Variation, Population, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Pneumonia, Viral, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Telemedicine, Coronavirus Infections, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review