The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intention to treat analysis in clinical trials when there are missing data
Open accessAbstract
Intention to treat analysis in clinical trials when there are missing data
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An intention-to-treat approach was used with imputation of missing data by last value carried forward (Streiner & Geddes, 2001).”
From Brief group‐based acceptance and commitment therapy for stroke survivors. (2019) · cites this paper as Streiner & Geddes, 2001
Citations
Cites
Biostatistics : The Bare Essentials
Norman, G. R., & Streiner, D. L. (1993) · Cited by 1,482
Self-citationGeddes, J. R., Freemantle, N., Harrison, P. J., & Bebbington, P. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7273.1371 · Cited by 1,056
Self-citationSample Size and Power in Psychiatric Research *
Streiner, D. L. (1990) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674379003500712 · Cited by 58
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Intention-to-treat concept: A review
Gupta, S. (2011) · Perspectives in Clinical Research · doi:10.4103/2229-3485.83221 · Cited by 1,921
“[9] However, in most cases, missing data could also be dealt by using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, whereby the last available measurement for each individual at the time point prior to withdrawal from the study is retained in the analysis.[20,21]”
MethodDeehan, E. C., Yang, C., Pérez-Muñoz, M. E., Nguyen, N. K., Cheng, C. C., Triador, L., Zhang, Z., Bakal, J. A., & Walter, J. (2020) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2020.01.006 · Cited by 564
Geriatric Care Management for Low-Income Seniors
Counsell, S. R., Callahan, C. M., Clark, D. O., Tu, W., Buttar, A. B., Stump, T. E., & Ricketts, G. D. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.22.2623 · Cited by 521
“Initial team conference, mean (range), d 25 (4-162)”
BackgroundMethodArmijo-Olivo, S., Warren, S., & Magee, D. (2009) · Physical Therapy Reviews · doi:10.1179/174328809x405928 · Cited by 361
Behavioural activation delivered by the non-specialist: phase II randomised controlled trial
Ekers, D., Richards, D., McMillan, D., Bland, J. M., & Gilbody, S. (2011) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.079111 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Streiner, D., & Geddes, J.
- Affiliations
- Editors, Evidence-Based Mental Health
- Venue
- Evidence Based Mental Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 70-71
- ISSN
- 1362-0347 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-960X
- OpenAlex
- W2150091817
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Evidence-Based Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- intention-to-treat analysis, missing data, clinical trials, missing data mechanisms, bias in treatment effect estimation
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Patient Dropouts, Models, Statistical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
