Cited by 36Asthma and respiratory diseasesData-Driven Disease SurveillanceAir Quality and Health Impacts

The impact of thunderstorm asthma on emergency department attendances across London during July 2013

Elliot, A J, Hughes, H E, Hughes, T C, Locker, T E, Brown, R, Sarran, C, Clewlow, Y, Murray, V +4 more·2014·Emergency Medicine Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study illustrates the potential of using emergency department attendance data, routinely accessed as part of a national syndromic surveillance system, to monitor the impact of thunderstorm asthma. METHODS: The Emergency Department Syndromic Surveillance System (EDSSS) routinely monitors anonymised attendance data on a daily basis across a sentinel network of 35 emergency departments. Attendance data for asthma, wheeze and difficulty breathing are analysed on a daily basis. RESULTS: A statistically significant spike in asthma attendances in two EDSSS emergency departments in London was detected on 23 July 2013, coinciding with a series of large violent thunderstorms across southern England. There was also an increase in the reported severity of these attendances. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary report illustrates the potential of the EDSSS to monitor the impact of thunderstorms on emergency department asthma attendances. Further work will focus on how this system can be used to quantify the impact on emergency departments, thus potentially improving resource planning and also adding to the thunderstorm asthma evidence-base.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/emermed-2013-203122

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On 21 November 2016, Melbourne, Australia, experienced a thunderstorm asthma health emergency that exceeded all previously reported thunderstorm asthma events.

    “On the 21st of November 2016, Melbourne, Australia, experienced a thunderstorm asthma health emergency (106, 107) that exceeded all previously reported thunderstorm asthma events [mainly in the UK and Australia (135, 136)].”

    From Epidemiology of Asthma in Children and Adults (2019) · cites this paper as [135]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elliot, A. J., Hughes, H. E., Hughes, T. C., Locker, T. E., Brown, R., Sarran, C., Clewlow, Y., Murray, V, Bone, A., Catchpole, M., McCloskey, B., & Smith, G. E.
Affiliations
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
  • Met Office (GB)
Corresponding author
Elliot, A J
Venue
Emergency Medicine Journal
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-10-07
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
675-678
ISSN
  • 1351-0622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-0205
  • 1472-0213
OpenAlex
W2016503143
Cited by
36
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emergency Medicine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • College of Emergency Medicine
  • Public Health England
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
Keywords
thunderstorm asthma, emergency department visits, syndromic surveillance, asthma, wheezing, thunderstorms, London
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Asthma, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, London, Male, Middle Aged, Seasons, Weather, Incidence, Young Adult, Public Health Surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review