Cited by 81Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsEducational Research and Methods

What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies?

Open access
Jafar, Anisa J N·2018·Emergency Medicine Journal

Abstract

Although we are increasingly reaping the benefits of qualitative studies, their approach and that of quantitative studies remain rather separate. Emergency medicine practitioners thrive off research in context as we deal with such an undifferentiated population however quantitative 'hard-science' work is conspicuous for its absence of positionality. This contrasts strongly with the way in which qualitative research, within the domain of so-called soft-science literature, uses positionality as an integral element of the research process. Without contextualising the researcher and research environment in qualitative studies, often the meaning of any research output is lost. What follows is that positionality does not undermine the truth of such research, instead it defines the boundaries within which the research was produced. ​ The absence of positionality when considered alongside the notion of bias, may challenge the quantitative idea of validity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/emermed-2017-207158

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jafar, A. J. N.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Jafar, Anisa J N
Venue
Emergency Medicine Journal
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-01-11
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
323-324
ISSN
  • 1351-0622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-0205
  • 1472-0213
OpenAlex
W2784299132
Cited by
81
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Emergency Medicine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal College of Emergency Medicine
  • Hong Kong Academy of Medicine
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
Keywords
researcher positionality, quantitative research, qualitative research, research bias, validity, researcher reflexivity, emergency medicine research, context in research
MeSH terms
Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review