Cited by 49Gastrointestinal motility and disordersHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeChronic Disease Management Strategies

Burden of irritable bowel syndrome in an increasingly cost-aware National Health Service

Open access
Soubieres, Anet, Wilson, Patrick, Poullis, Andrew, Wilkins, Julia, Rance, Mark·2015·Frontline Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background: The National Health Service (NHS) is faced with increasing cost pressures that make the efficient use of resources paramount. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) places a large burden on the NHS as it has been estimated that at least 12% of the UK population is affected. However, poor clinical coding makes accurate assessment of this burden challenging. Objective: To calculate primary-care prescribing and both hospital outpatient and admission costs associated with the management of IBS in England. Design and main outcome measures: Hospital Episode Statistics data for 2012–2013 for all clinical commissioning groups in England were analysed to calculate the tariff cost of IBS. Prescribing analysis and cost tabulation (PACT) data for this period were also analysed. Results: In 2012–2013, there were 1 219 961 outpatient attendances in gastroenterology and colorectal surgery specialties. Despite this, only 1982 patients were recorded with IBS-specific codes, with a total estimated tariff cost of £812 336. In addition, 28 849 patients were recorded with IBS-related symptom codes at a cost of £11 002 874. In 2011–2012, there were 658 698 diagnostic lower gastrointestinal endoscopies at a tariff cost of £16 967 670 4. Of these, 323 752 (49%) had no further follow-up in secondary care over the subsequent 12 months. PACT data indicated that £44 977 959 and £25 582 752, respectively, were spent on selected laxatives and antispasmodics commonly used to treat IBS in primary care. Conclusions: Better diagnosing, through improved clinical coding and standardisation of diagnostic criteria, is required to more accurately assess the true burden and allow optimal management of IBS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/flgastro-2014-100542

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lower gastrointestinal symptoms frequently prompt people to present to primary care, accounting for approximately 1 in 12 of all consultations.

    “Nevertheless, lower gastrointestinal symptoms frequently prompt people to present to primary care, 81 accounting for approximately 1 in 12 of all consultations.82”

    From British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of irritable bowel syndrome (2021) · cites this paper as [81]

    Citation 82 is attached to the estimate that lower gastrointestinal symptoms account for approximately 1 in 12 primary-care consultations. The Discussion instead reports that IBS or IBS-related symptoms account for approximately 7.5% of outpatient attendances across all specialties; the Introduction describes a primary-care burden but gives no proportion of all primary-care consultations. Searches for the one-in-twelve estimate and a primary-care consultation percentage found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Soubieres A, et al. Frontline Gastroenterology 2015;6:246-251. doi:10.1136/flgastro-2014-100542 on July 12, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://fg.bmj.com/ Frontline Gastroenterol: first published as 10.1136/flgastro-2014-100542 on 24 February 2015. Downloaded from REFERENCES
  2. Thompson WG, Creed F, Drossman DA, et al. Functional bowel disease and functional abdominal pain. Gastroenterol Int 1992;5:75-91.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soubieres, A., Wilson, P., Poullis, A., Wilkins, J., & Rance, M.
Affiliations
  • St George's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
  • St George's Hospital (GB)
  • Harvey Walsh Ltd, Runcorn, UK
  • Almirall UK, Uxbridge, UK
Venue
Frontline Gastroenterology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-02-24
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
246-251
ISSN
  • 2041-4137 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-4145
OpenAlex
W2116726590
Cited by
49
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontline Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, health care costs, National Health Service, medical coding, primary care prescribing, hospitalization, laxatives, antispasmodic agents, lower gastrointestinal endoscopy, diagnostic follow-up

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review