Cited by 1Gastrointestinal motility and disordersHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeChronic Disease Management Strategies

Healthcare utilisation and healthcare costs for patients with hypermobile spectrum disorders and coexisting functional dyspepsia and/or irritable bowel syndrome

Upadhyaya, Advait, Topan, Rabia, Pandya, Shraya, Williams, Sarah, Fragkos, Konstantinos, Zarate-Lopez, Natalia, Roukas, Chris, Mihaylova, Borislava +1 more·2025·Frontline Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background/objective Disorders of Gut–Brain interactions (DGBI), for example, Functional Dyspepsia (FD) or Irritable Bowel syndrome (IBS), are common in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome/hypermobile spectrum disorder (hEDS/HSD). DGBI is associated with significant healthcare use—how this applies to patients with coexisting hEDS/HSD is unknown. Design A cross-sectional study was performed. Patients recruited from tertiary neurogastroenterology clinics and from Ehlers-Danlos Support UK completed questionnaires, characterising their demographic, healthcare data and expenses, over 6 months (July 2021–January 2022) and their Rome IV diagnoses. National Health Service (NHS) unit costs were used. Healthcare use and costs were compared across and between DGBI and non-DGBI subgroups. Regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of costs. p £20 000 pp/6 months). Predictors of rising costs were FD, non-gastrointestinal comorbidities, lower body mass index, positive avoidant/restrictive food intake disorders screen, having an altered diet, polypharmacy, visits to different healthcare professionals and tertiary neurogastroenterology recruitment. Conclusions It is imperative to develop cost-effective multidisciplinary services for hEDS/HSD patients with FD, particularly in the current fiscal climate, as they have significant healthcare use and costs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/flgastro-2025-103250

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Upadhyaya, A., Topan, R., Pandya, S., Williams, S., Fragkos, K., Zarate-Lopez, N., Roukas, C., Mihaylova, B., & Fikree, A.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Gastoenterology and GI Physiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Venue
Frontline Gastroenterology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2025-09-11
Pages
flgastro-2025-103250
ISSN
  • 2041-4137 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-4145
OpenAlex
W4414154028
Cited by
1
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Frontline Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, functional gastrointestinal disorders, health care utilization, health care costs, cost predictors, polypharmacy, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, multidisciplinary care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review