The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Epidemiology of cerebral palsy in England and Scotland, 1984–9
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: To report on the epidemiology of cerebral palsy in England and Scotland, to provide information on the prevalence of cerebral palsy and the severity of the disability or any co-morbidity. METHODS: Cerebral palsy registers were compiled from multiple sources of ascertainment covering all of Scotland and the counties of Merseyside, Cheshire, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Northamptonshire and Oxfordshire in England. All cases of cerebral palsy born in 1984 to 1989, to mothers resident in the area, were included. Denominator number of live births and neonatal deaths for determining birthweight specific prevalence were obtained from birth and death registrations. Learning, manual, and ambulatory disabilities were graded for severity. Any co-existing sensory (hearing or visual) morbidity was also graded for severity. RESULTS: There were 789 411 live births in 1984–9, with 3651 neonatal deaths (neonatal mortality 4.6 per 1000 live births) and 1649 cases of cerebral palsy—a cerebral palsy prevalence of 2.1 per 1000 neonatal survivors. The birthweight specific cerebral palsy prevalence ranged from 1.1 per 1000 neonatal survivors in infants weighing ⩾2500 g to 78.1 in infants weighing <1000 g. There was no significant time trend in prevalence of cerebral palsy in any of the birthweight groups, in contrast to the fall in neonatal mortality observed in all birthweight groups. Of the 1649 cases of cerebral palsy, 550 (33.4%) had severe ambulatory disability (no independent walking), 390 (23.7%) had severe manual disability (incapable of feeding or dressing unaided), 381 (23.1%) had severe learning disability (IQ <50), 146 (8.9%) had severe visual disability (vision <6/60 in the better eye) and 12 had severe hearing disability (>70 dB loss). CONCLUSIONS: Registers fill an important gap left by the lack of routine data on the prevalence of disability in children. The ability to record trends in the prevalence and the severity of the disability should inform those who have responsibility for providing services for children with disabilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood
Saigal, S., & Doyle, L. W. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60136-1 · Cited by 2,818
An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Oskoui, M., Coutinho, F., Dykeman, J., Jetté, N., & Pringsheim, T. (2013) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.12080 · Cited by 1,512
Slattery, M. M., & Morrison, J. J. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11476-0 · Cited by 675
A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children
Bosanquet, M., Copeland, L., Ware, R., & Boyd, R. (2013) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.12140 · Cited by 518
Metadata
- Authors
- Pharoah, P. O. D., Cooke, T., Johnson, M. A., King, R., & Mutch, L.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1998-07-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- F21-F25
- ISSN
- 1359-2998 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2052
- OpenAlex
- W2122596654
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of cerebral palsy in England and Scotland, 1984–9. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/fn.79.1.f21
- The paper
- Pharoah, P. O. D., Cooke, T., Johnson, M. A., King, R., & Mutch, L. (1998). Epidemiology of cerebral palsy in England and Scotland, 1984–9. Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition. https://doi.org/10.1136/fn.79.1.f21
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.