Cited by 518Cerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children

Open access
Bosanquet, Margot, Copeland, Lisa, Ware, Robert, Boyd, Roslyn·2013·Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

Abstract

Aim: This systematic review evaluates the accuracy of predictive assessments and investigations used to assist in the diagnosis of cerebral palsy (CP) in preschool‐age children (<5y). Method: Six databases were searched for studies that included a diagnosis of CP validated after 2 years of age. The validity of the studies meeting the criteria was evaluated using the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy criteria. Where possible, results were pooled and a meta‐analysis was undertaken. Results: Nineteen out of 351 studies met the full inclusion criteria, including studies of general movements assessment (GMA), cranial ultrasound, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and neurological examination. All studies assessed high‐risk populations including preterm (gestational range 23–41wks) and low‐birthweight infants (range 500–4350g). Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity of GMA were 98% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74–100%) and 91% (95% CI 83–93%) respectively; of cranial ultrasound 74% (95% CI 63–83%) and 92% (95% CI 81–96%) respectively; and of neurological examination 88% (95% CI 55–97%) and 87% (95% CI 57–97%) respectively. MRI performed at term corrected age (in preterm infants) appeared to be a strong predictor of CP, with sensitivity ranging in individual studies from 86 to 100% and specificity ranging from 89 to 97% There was inadequate evidence for the use of other predictive tools. Summary: This review found that the assessment with the best evidence and strength for predictive accuracy is the GMA. MRI has a good predictive value when performed at term‐corrected age. Cranial ultrasound is as specific as MRI and has the advantage of being readily available at the bedside. Studies to date have focused on high‐risk infants. The accuracy of these tests in low‐risk infants remains unclear and requires further research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dmcn.12140

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • New international clinical practice guidelines aim to shift detection of infants at high risk of CP earlier, to 12 to 24 weeks corrected age, which is significantly earlier than previous diagnosis windows in Australia at 19 months.

    “New international clinical practice guidelines exist for identifying infants at high risk of cerebral palsy (CP) earlier: between 12 to 24 weeks corrected age, significantly earlier than previous diagnosis windows in Australia at 19 months.”

    From Early Parenting Acceptance and Commitment Therapy ‘Early PACT’ for parents of infants with cerebral palsy: a study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Clinical implications section says that tools can help predict cerebral palsy in high-risk infants and enable early intervention. The paper does not report new international clinical practice guidelines, a 12–24-week corrected-age detection window, or a previous Australian diagnosis window of 19 months (pages unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bossuyt P, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards com- plete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accu- racy: the STARD initiative. Clin Chem 2003; 49: 1-6.
  2. Adde L, Rygg M, Lossius K, Oberg GK, Stoen R. Gen- eral movement assessment: predicting cerebral palsy in clinical practice. Early Hum Dev 2007; 83: 13-8.
  3. Kirton A, Shroff M, Visvanathan T, deVeber G. Quanti- fied corticospinal tract diffusion restriction predicts neo- natal stroke outcome. Stroke 2007; 38: 974-80.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bosanquet, M., Copeland, L., Ware, R., & Boyd, R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service (AU)
Corresponding author
Bosanquet, Margot
Venue
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-11
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
418-426
ISSN
  • 0012-1622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8749
OpenAlex
W2010394425
Cited by
518
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Children's Medical Research
  • Children's Hospital Foundation
  • Royal Children's Hospital Foundation
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (473840)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
cerebral palsy, early diagnosis, prediction accuracy, General Movements Assessment, cranial ultrasound, brain MRI, neurological examination, preterm infants, low birth weight, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Cerebral Palsy, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Movement, Neurologic Examination, Predictive Value of Tests, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review