CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 568COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and Burnout

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers: A cross-sectional study in China

Open access
Que, Jianyu, Shi, Le, Deng, Jiahui, Liu, Jiajia, Zhang, Li, Wu, Suying, Gong, Yimiao, Huang, Weizhen, Yuan, Kai, Yan, Wei, Sun, Yankun, Ran, Maosheng, Bao, Yanping, Lu, Lin·2020·General Psychiatry
DOI 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100259PMC PMC7299004
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers fighting against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are under tremendous pressure, which puts them at an increased risk of developing psychological problems. AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of psychological problems in different healthcare workers (ie, physicians, medical residents, nurses, technicians and public health professionals) during the COVID-19 pandemic in China and explore factors that are associated with the onset of psychological problems in this population during this public health crisis. METHODS: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted in February 2020 among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological problems were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire and Insomnia Severity Index. Logistic regression analyses were used to explore the factors that were associated with psychological problems. RESULTS: The prevalence of symptoms of anxiety, depression, insomnia and the overall psychological problems in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in China was 46.04%, 44.37%, 28.75% and 56.59%, respectively. The prevalence of the overall psychological problems in physicians, medical residents, nurses, technicians and public health professionals was 60.35%, 50.82%, 62.02%, 57.54% and 62.40%, respectively. Compared with healthcare workers who did not participate in front-line work, front-line healthcare workers had a higher risk of anxiety, insomnia and overall psychological problems. In addition, attention to negative or neutral information about the pandemic, receiving negative feedback from families and friends who joined front-line work, and unwillingness to join front-line work if given a free choice were three major factors for these psychological problems. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological problems are pervasive among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Receiving negative information and participating in front-line work appear to be important risk factors for psychological problems. The psychological health of different healthcare workers should be protected during the COVID-19 pandemic with timely interventions and proper information feedback.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100259

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Flow chart of subjects’ enrollment.
Figure 1 Flow chart of subjects’ enrollment.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Li N, 2001, An investigation on the mental health status of tobacco dependent soldiers, Chin J Behav Med Sci, 10, 23
  2. He X, 2010, Reliability and validity of a generalized anxiety disorder scale in general hospital outpatients, Shanghai Arch Psychiatry, 22, 200
  3. Li E, 2019, Psychometric property of the insomnia severity index in students of a commercial school, J Neurosci Ment Health, 19, 268
  4. 10.1197/j.aem.2004.11.015 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 566

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Que, J., Shi, L., Deng, J., Liu, J., Zhang, L., Wu, S., Gong, Y., Huang, W., Yuan, K., Yan, W., Sun, Y., Ran, M., Bao, Y., & Lu, L.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Xiamen City Xianyue Hospital Xiamen Fujian China
  • Peking University Sixth Hospital Peking University Institute of Mental Health NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University) National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital) Beijing China
  • Department of Social Work and Social Administration University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
Corresponding author
Bao, Yanping
ORCID
Venue
General Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
e100259-e100259
ISSN
  • 2096-5923 (ISSN-L)
  • 2517-729X
DOI
10.1136/gpsych-2020-100259
PMC
PMC7299004
OpenAlex
W3034574392
Cited by
568
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 161 · 2021: 210 · 2020: 39
FWCI
49.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • General Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31900805, 81761128036, 81821092)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (7194336)
  • Special Research Fund of PKUHSC for Prevention and Control of COVID-19 (BMU2020HKYZX008)
  • Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7194336)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers, mental illness, anxiety, depression, insomnia, physicians, nurses, medical residents, public health workforce, risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review