Cited by 49Inflammatory Bowel DiseasePharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection

Red cell abnormalities associated with sulphasalazine maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis

Open access
Pounder, R E, Craven, E R, Henthorn, J S, Bannatyne, J M·1975·Gut

Abstract

Of 52 patients receiving a mean dose of 2.5g sulphasalazine/day as maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis, 35 were found to have one or more drug-induced red cell abnormalities, which were not found in 50 normal controls or in 10 colitics not receiving sulphasalazine. Twenty-three of the treated patients had contracted red cells, an abnormality that is thought to result in mild haemolysis. Red cell contraction was related to the dose of sulphasalazine (P smaller than 0.01), the serum total sulphapyridine level (P smaller than 0.001), and acetylator status. Eleven of the treated patients had a macrocytosis, 21 had elevated levels of methaemoglobin, and one had Heinz bodies. A dose of 1.5 g sulphasalazine/day was not associated with red cell contraction, and is suggested as a safer maintenance dose for the asymptomatic colitic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.16.3.181

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dacie, J. V. (1967). The Haemolytic Anaemias, Congenital andAcquired. Part IV, 2nd ed., pp. 1035-1036. Churchill, London.
  2. Svartz, N. (1942). Salazopyrin, a new sulfanilamide preparation. Acta med. scand., 110, 577-598. on July 18, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://gut.bmj.com/ Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.16.3.181 on 1 March 1975. Downloaded from

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pounder, R. E., Craven, E. R., Henthorn, J. S., & Bannatyne, J. M.
Affiliations
Central Middlesex Hospital (GB)
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1975-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
181-186
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2050453675
Cited by
49
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
Keywords
sulfasalazine, ulcerative colitis, hemolysis, acetylator phenotype, macrocytosis, methemoglobin, Heinz bodies, maintenance therapy
MeSH terms
Anemia, Hemolytic, Colitis, Ulcerative, Erythrocyte Count, Erythrocytes, Abnormal, Heinz Bodies, Hematocrit, Hematologic Diseases, Humans, Methemoglobinemia, Pyridines, Reticulocytes, Sulfasalazine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review