The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calprotectin is a stronger predictive marker of relapse in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn’s disease
Open accessAbstract
Background and aims: The clinical course of inflammatory bowel disease is characterised by a succession of relapses and remissions. The aim of our study was to assess whether the predictive value of faecal calprotectin—a non-invasive marker of intestinal inflammation—for clinical relapse is different in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods: Seventy nine consecutive patients with a diagnosis of clinically quiescent inflammatory bowel disease (38 CD and 41 UC) were followed for 12 months, undergoing regular clinical evaluations and blood tests. A single stool sample was collected at the beginning of the study from each patient and the calprotectin concentration was assessed by a commercially available enzyme linked immunoassay. Results: In CD, median calprotectin values were 220.1 μg/g (95% confidence interval (CI) 21.7–418.5) in those patients who relapsed during follow up, and 220.5 μg/g (95% CI 53–388) in non-relapsing patients (p = 0.395). In UC, median calprotectin values were 220.6 μg/g (95% CI 86–355.2) and 67 μg/g (95% CI 15–119) in relapsing and non-relapsing patients, respectively (p<0.0001). The multivariate Cox (proportional hazard) regression model, after adjustment for possible confounding variables, showed a twofold and 14-fold increase in the relapse risk, respectively, in those patients with CD and UC in clinical remission who had a faecal calprotectin concentration higher than 150 μg/g. Conclusions: Faecal calprotectin proved to be an even stronger predictor of clinical relapse in UC than in CD, which makes the test a promising non-invasive tool for monitoring and optimising therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Endoscopic monitoring of Crohn's disease treatment: A prospective, randomized clinical trial
Landi, B., Anh, T. N., Cortot, A., Soule, J. C., Rene, E., Gendre, J. P., Bories, P., See, A., Metman, E. H., Florent, C., et al. (1992) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(92)91725-j · Cited by 261
Cited by
Turner, D., Walsh, C. M., Steinhart, A. H., & Griffiths, A. M. (2007) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.033 · Cited by 659
Calprotectin: from biomarker to biological function
Jukic, A., Bakiri, L., Wagner, E. F., Tilg, H., & Adolph, T. E. (2021) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324855 · Cited by 500
Henriksen, M., Jahnsen, J., Lygren, I., Stray, N., Sauar, J., Vatn, M. H., Moum, B., & and the IBSEN Study Group (2008) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2007.146357 · Cited by 420
Le Gall, G., Noor, S. O., Ridgway, K., Scovell, L., Jamieson, C., Johnson, I. T., Colquhoun, I. J., Kemsley, E. K., & Narbad, A. (2011) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr2003598 · Cited by 348
Methods to determine intestinal permeability and bacterial translocation during liver disease
Wang, L., Llorente, C., Hartmann, P., Yang, A.-M., Chen, P., & Schnabl, B. (2015) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jim.2014.12.015 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Costa, F., Mumolo, M. G., Ceccarelli, L., Bellini, M., Romano, M. R., Sterpi, C., Ricchiuti, A., Marchi, S., & Bottai, M.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-02-11
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 364-368
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2160240762
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calprotectin is a stronger predictive marker of relapse in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn’s disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2004.043406
- The paper
- Costa, F., Mumolo, M. G., Ceccarelli, L., Bellini, M., Romano, M. R., Sterpi, C., Ricchiuti, A., Marchi, S., & Bottai, M. (2005). Calprotectin is a stronger predictive marker of relapse in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn’s disease. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2004.043406
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.