Anticipation in familial pancreatic cancer
Open accessAbstract
Background: Previous studies of anticipation in familial pancreatic cancer have been small and subject to ascertainment bias. Our aim was to determine evidence for anticipation in a large number of European families. Patients and methods: A total of 1223 individuals at risk from 106 families (264 affected individuals) were investigated. Generation G3 was defined as the latest generation that included any individual aged over 39 years; preceding generations were then defined as G2 and G1. Results: With 80 affected child-parent pairs, the children died a median (interquartile range) of 10 (7, 14) years earlier. The median (interquartile range) age of death from pancreatic cancer was 70 (59, 77), 64 (57, 69), and 49 (44, 56) years for G1, G2, and G3, respectively. These indications of anticipation could be the result of bias. Truncation of Kaplan-Meier analysis to a 60 year period to correct for follow up time bias and a matched test statistic indicated significant anticipation (p = 0.002 and p<0.001). To minimise bias further, an iterative analysis to predict cancer numbers was developed. No single risk category could be applied that accurately predicted cancer cases in every generation. Using three risk categories (low with no pancreatic cancer in earlier generations, high with a single earlier generation, and very high where two preceding generations were affected), incidence was estimated without significant error. Anticipation was independent of smoking. Conclusion: This study provides the first strong evidence for anticipation in familial pancreatic cancer and must be considered in genetic counselling and the commencement of secondary screening for pancreatic cancer.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EUROPAC has shown that in familial pancreatic cancer the age at onset of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma becomes progressively younger in each generation.
“EUROPAC has also shown that the age of onset of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma becomes progressively earlier with each generation in familial pancreatic cancer,99”
From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [99]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
BRCA2 germline mutations in familial pancreatic carcinoma
Hahn, S. A., Greenhalf, B., Ellis, I., Sina-Frey, M., Rieder, H., Korte, B., Gerdes, B., Kress, R., Ziegler, A., Raeburn, J. A., et al. (2003) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/95.3.214 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
CDKN2A Germline Mutations in Familial Pancreatic Cancer
Bartsch, D. K., Sina-Frey, M., Lang, S., Wild, A., Gerdes, B., Barth, P., Kress, R., Grützmann, R., Colombo-Benkmann, M., Ziegler, A., et al. (2002) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200212000-00005 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Early detection of pancreatic cancer
Pereira, S. P., Oldfield, L., Ney, A., Hart, P. A., Keane, M. G., Pandol, S. J., Li, D., Greenhalf, W., Jeon, C. Y., Koay, E. J., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30416-9 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Self-citationThe role of endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic cancer screening
Bhutani, M., Koduru, P., Joshi, V., Saxena, P., Suzuki, R., Irisawa, A., & Yamao, K. (2016) · Endoscopic Ultrasound · doi:10.4103/2303-9027.175876 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Surveillance for neoplasia in the pancreas
Overbeek, K. A., Cahen, D. L., Canto, M. I., & Bruno, M. J. (2016) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2016.10.013 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- McFaul, C. D., Greenhalf, W., Earl, J., Howes, N., Neoptolemos, J. P., Kress, R., Sina-Frey, M., Rieder, H., Hahn, S., & Bartsch, D. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
- Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Greenhalf, W
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-06-21
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 252-258
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- PMC
- PMC1856528
- OpenAlex
- W2004481334
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Gut (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Keywords
- familial pancreatic cancer, anticipation, age at death, truncation bias, cancer incidence prediction, risk categories, smoking, genetic counseling, secondary screening
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Epidemiologic Methods, Europe, Female, Humans, Longevity, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Pedigree, Smoking, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Anticipation, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review