Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 634

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alterations in intestinal permeability

Open access
Arrieta, M C, Bistritz, L, Meddings, J B·2006·Gut

Abstract

he goal of this review is to describe barrier function of the intestine, the structure of the tight junction, methods to evaluate intestinal permeability, and most importantly the relevance of abnormal permeability to disease.In this context, we will also present an emerging paradigm regarding the genesis of autoimmune diseases and describe the data that supports this from the perspective of both human disease and animal models.While this is a complicated area there are several points worth remembering: c epithelial permeability of the gastrointestinal tract can be evaluated in a site specific manner; c increased intestinal permeability is observed in association with several autoimmune diseases.It is observed prior to disease and appears to be involved in disease pathogenesis; c there are new and novel therapies directed at altering abnormally increased intestinal permeability and these may play a role in treating or preventing these diseases. BARRIER FUNCTION cFrom the lower oesophageal sphincter to the anus, the gastrointestinal tract has a single contiguous layer of cells that separates the inside of the body from the external environment.Separation is important as there are a wide variety of environmental agents in the lumen of the bowel that can initiate or perpetuate mucosal inflammation if they cross the epithelial barrier.While the epithelial lining of the intestine plays a critical role in preventing access of these agents, it is not the only component of what is termed barrier function.Also important are secreted products such as immunoglobulin, mucous, defensins, and other antimicrobial products.The importance of epithelial barrier function in normal homeostasis can be appreciated from experiments performed in the early 1990s where cell wall extracts from luminal bacteria were injected into the colonic wall of rats. 1 This simple manoeuvre of bypassing the epithelial barrier and placing luminal compounds directly into the colonic wall initiated an inflammatory disease that was characterised by granulomatous reactions both in the bowel and, importantly, as a systemic inflammatory process.Similar results were also observed by variably expressing a dominant negative N-cadherin mutant in epithelial cells along the crypt-villus axis.This induced abnormal function of intercellular junctions and initiated a mucosal inflammatory disorder that resembled Crohn's disease. 2 The important concept that emerges from these experiments is that by simply abrogating epithelial barrier function, inflammatory disease can be induced in a susceptible host with features that are expressed both locally and systemically.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.2005.085373

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 634

Metadata

Authors
Arrieta, M. C., Bistritz, L., & Meddings, J. B.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-09-11
Volume
55
Issue
10
Pages
1512-1520
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2159745814
Cited by
634
References
5
FWCI
11.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alterations in intestinal permeability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2005.085373
The paper
Arrieta, M. C., Bistritz, L., & Meddings, J. B. (2006). Alterations in intestinal permeability. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2005.085373

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.