The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-term prognosis of autoimmune pancreatitis with and without corticosteroid treatment
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a unique form of chronic pancreatitis, and has a favourable response to corticosteroid treatment (CST). Little is known, however, about the long-term outcome of AIP. This study aimed to document the prognosis without and with CST, and to examine the indication for CST. Patients and methods: The prognosis and clinical features of 23 patients without CST and 19 patients treated with CST from onset were investigated. In addition, factors concerning the late occurrence of unfavourable events related to AIP were examined. Results: The patients without CST were 19 men and four women, with an average age of 66 years. After an average observation period of 25 months, 16 patients (70%) developed unfavourable events including obstructive jaundice as a result of distal bile duct stenosis in four, growing pseudocyst in one, sclerogenic changes of extrapancreatic bile duct in nine, hydronephrosis as a result of retroperitoneal fibrosis in one, and interstitial nephritis in one. Patients with obstructive jaundice at onset showed a higher cumulative event occurrence rate (p = 0.025). The patients treated with CST were 16 men and three women, with an average age of 64 years. After an average observation period of 23 months, six patients (32%) developed unfavourable events consisting of interstitial pneumonia in three, and a recurrence of obstructive jaundice in three. In multivariate analysis, CST (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12–0.89, p = 0.029) and obstructive jaundice at onset (HR 3.09, 95% CI 1.14–8.32, p = 0.026) were significant predictive factors for unfavourable events. Conclusion: CST could reduce AIP-related unfavourable events. The early introduction of CST is recommended especially for patients with obstructive jaundice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chapman, M. H., Thorburn, D., Hirschfield, G. M., Webster, G. G. J., Rushbrook, S. M., Alexander, G., Collier, J., Dyson, J. K., Jones, D. E., Patanwala, I., et al. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317993 · Cited by 284
European Guideline on IgG4-related digestive disease - UEG and SGF evidence-based recommendations
Löhr, J., Beuers, U., Vujasinovic, M., Alvaro, D., Frøkjær, J. B., Buttgereit, F., Capurso, G., Culver, E. L., de‐Madaria, E., Della‐Torre, E., et al. (2020) · United European Gastroenterology Journal · doi:10.1177/2050640620934911 · Cited by 252
Buijs, J., van Heerde, M. J., Rauws, E. A. J., de Buy Wenniger, L. J. M., Hansen, B. E., Biermann, K., Verheij, J., Vleggaar, F. P., Brink, M. A., Beuers, U. H. W., et al. (2014) · Pancreas · doi:10.1097/mpa.0000000000000044 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirano, K., Tada, M., Isayama, H., Yagioka, H., Sasaki, T., Kogure, H., Nakai, Y., Sasahira, N., Tsujino, T., Yoshida, H., Kawabe, T., & Omata, M.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2007-05-24
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1719-1724
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2166865896
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term prognosis of autoimmune pancreatitis with and without corticosteroid treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2006.115246
- The paper
- Hirano, K., Tada, M., Isayama, H., Yagioka, H., Sasaki, T., Kogure, H., Nakai, Y., Sasahira, N., Tsujino, T., Yoshida, H., Kawabe, T., & Omata, M. (2007). Long-term prognosis of autoimmune pancreatitis with and without corticosteroid treatment. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2006.115246
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.