The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association between chromosomal instability and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that microsatellite instability (MSI) resulting from defective DNA mismatch repair confers a better prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). Recently, however, data have suggested this is secondary to the effects of ploidy/chromosomal instability (CIN). To estimate the prognostic significance of CIN for survival, data from published studies have been reviewed and pooled. METHODS: Studies stratifying survival in CRC by CIN status were identified by searching PubMed and hand-searching bibliographies of identified studies. Two reviewers confirmed study eligibility and extracted data independently, and data were pooled using a fixed-effects model. The principal outcome measure was the HR for death. RESULTS: 63 eligible studies reported outcome in 10 126 patients, 60.0% of whom had CIN+ (aneuploid/polyploid) tumours. The overall HR associated with CIN was 1.45 (95% CI 1.35 to 1.55, p<0.001). In patients with stage II-III CRCs, the HR was 1.45 (95% CI 1.27 to 1.65, p<0.001). The effect was similar for progression-free survival (HR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.51 to 1.94, p<0.001). There was no evidence of significant interstudy heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: CIN is associated with a worse prognosis in CRC, and should be evaluated as a prognostic marker, together with MSI status, in all clinical trials, particularly those involving adjuvant therapies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61 · Cited by 1,374
Egger, M., Jüni, P., Bartlett, C., Holenstein, F., & Sterne, J. (2003) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta7010 · Cited by 1,181 · cited 1×
“small effects on the HR and CI, while the inability to assess study quality increases heterogeneity.(147) It is not clear how CIN status relates to more sophisticated pathological staging beyond the AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) staging employed in the studies analysed.”
Background
Cited by
A distinct role for Lgr5+ stem cells in primary and metastatic colon cancer
de Sousa e Melo, F., Kurtova, A. V., Harnoss, J. M., Kljavin, N., Hoeck, J. D., Hung, J., Anderson, J. E., Storm, E. E., Modrusan, Z., Koeppen, H., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21713 · Cited by 788
Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore–microtubule dynamics
Bakhoum, S. F., Thompson, S. L., Manning, A. L., & Compton, D. A. (2009) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1809 · Cited by 453
Polyploidy in tissue homeostasis and regeneration
Øvrebø, J. I., & Edgar, B. A. (2018) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.156034 · Cited by 171
Eischen, C. M. (2016) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a026096 · Cited by 161
Rampazzo, E., Bertorelle, R., Serra, L., Terrin, L., Candiotto, C., Pucciarelli, S., Bianco, P. D., Nitti, D., & De Rossi, A. (2010) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605644 · Cited by 125
“In agreement with previous studies (Iacopetta, 2002; Gervaz et al, 2004; Walther et al, 2008), we found that MSI status was strongly associated with tumour origin in the right colon.”
BackgroundResult
Metadata
- Authors
- Walther, A., Houlston, R., & Tomlinson, I.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-02-27
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 941-950
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125157023
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association between chromosomal instability and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2007.135004
- The paper
- Walther, A., Houlston, R., & Tomlinson, I. (2008). Association between chromosomal instability and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2007.135004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.