Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hedgehog inhibition prolongs survival in a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer

Open access
Feldmann, G, Habbe, N, Dhara, S, Bisht, S, Alvarez, H, Fendrich, V, Beaty, R, Mullendore, M, Karikari, C, Bardeesy, N, Ouellette, M M, Yu, W, Maitra, A·2008·Gut

Abstract

Background and aims: Pancreatic cancer is among the most dismal of human malignancies. Current therapeutic strategies are virtually ineffective in controlling advanced, metastatic disease. Recent evidence suggests that the Hedgehog signalling pathway is aberrantly reactivated in the majority of pancreatic cancers, and that Hedgehog blockade has the potential to prevent disease progression and metastatic spread. Methods: Here it is shown that the Hedgehog pathway is activated in the Pdx1-Cre;LsL-Kras G12D ;Ink4a/Arf lox/lox transgenic mouse model of pancreatic cancer. The effect of Hedgehog pathway inhibition on survival was determined by continuous application of the small molecule cyclopamine, a smoothened antagonist. Microarray analysis was performed on non-malignant human pancreatic ductal cells overexpressing Gli1 in order to screen for downstream Hedgehog target genes likely to be involved in pancreatic cancer progression. Results: Hedgehog inhibition with cyclopamine significantly prolonged median survival in the transgenic mouse model used here (67 vs 61 days; p = 0.026). In vitro data indicated that Hedgehog activation might at least in part be ascribed to oncogenic Kras signalling. Microarray analysis identified 26 potential Hedgehog target genes that had previously been found to be overexpressed in pancreatic cancer. Five of them, BIRC3, COL11A1, NNMT, PLAU and TGM2, had been described as upregulated in more than one global gene expression analysis before. Conclusion: This study provides another line of evidence that Hedgehog signalling is a valid target for the development of novel therapeutics for pancreatic cancer that might be worth evaluating soon in a clinical setting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.2007.148189

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Feldmann, G., Habbe, N., Dhara, S., Bisht, S., Alvarez, H., Fendrich, V, Beaty, R., Mullendore, M., Karikari, C., Bardeesy, N., Ouellette, M. M., Yu, W., & Maitra, A.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2008-05-30
Volume
57
Issue
10
Pages
1420-1430
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2171203391
Cited by
193
References
6
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hedgehog inhibition prolongs survival in a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2007.148189
The paper
Feldmann, G., Habbe, N., Dhara, S., Bisht, S., Alvarez, H., Fendrich, V, Beaty, R., Mullendore, M., Karikari, C., Bardeesy, N., Ouellette, M. M., Yu, W., & Maitra, A. (2008). Hedgehog inhibition prolongs survival in a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2007.148189

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.