Cited by 98Celiac Disease Research and ManagementWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Is it true that coeliacs do not digest gliadin? Degradation pattern of gliadin in coeliac disease small intestinal mucosa: Figure 1

Open access
Bernardo, D, Garrote, J A, Nadal, I, León, A J, Calvo, C, Fernández-Salazar, L, Blanco-Quirós, A, Sanz, Y +1 more·2009·Gut

Abstract

Prolyl-endopeptidase supplementation has been proposed to favour gliadin degradation as an alternative treatment for coeliac disease (CD), although the real usefulness of this therapy in vivo is still under discussion. 1 However, our data point to alternative treatments aiming to modify the intestinal microbiota in patients with CD by the use of probiotics and/or prebiotics. We propose that the induction of gliadin proteolysis in the human gut might not be the solution but the origin of CD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.2008.167296

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An increase in proteolytic activity towards gluten proteins has been observed in the duodenum and feces of celiac disease patients.

    “an increase in proteolytic activity towards gluten proteins has been observed in the duodenum and feces of CeD patients.41,42”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernardo, D., Garrote, J. A., Nadal, I., León, A. J., Calvo, C., Fernández-Salazar, L., Blanco-Quirós, A., Sanz, Y., & Arranz, E.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Valladolid (ES)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid (ES)
Corresponding author
Arranz, E
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2009-05-11
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
886-887
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2069752121
Cited by
98
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Valladolid Documentary Repository (University of Valladolid) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Hispana (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • UVaDOC UVaDOC University of Valladolid Documentary Repository (University of Valladolid) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
  • Generalitat Valenciana
  • Universidad de Valladolid
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
celiac disease, gliadin, prolyl endopeptidase, small intestinal mucosa, gut microbiota, probiotics, prebiotics
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Celiac Disease, Digestion, Duodenum, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Gliadin, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Peptide Hydrolases, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review