Cited by 936

Differential expression of microRNAs in plasma of patients with colorectal cancer: a potential marker for colorectal cancer screening

Ng, E K O, Chong, W W S, Jin, H, Lam, E K Y, Shin, V Y, Yu, J, Poon, T C W, Ng, S S M +1 more·2009·Gut

Abstract

Objective: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been shown to offer great potential in the diagnosis of cancer. We investigated whether plasma miRNAs could discriminate between patients with and without colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: This study was divided into three phases: (1) marker discovery using real-time PCR-based miRNA profiling on plasma, corresponding cancerous and adjacent non-cancerous colonic tissues of five patients with CRC, along with plasma from five healthy individuals as controls; (2) marker selection and validation by real-time quantitative RT-PCR on a small set of plasma; and (3) independent validation on a large set of plasma from 90 patients with CRC, 20 patients with gastric cancer, 20 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and 50 healthy controls. Results: Of the panel of 95 miRNAs analysed, five were upregulated both in plasma and tissue samples. All the five miRNAs were validated on the plasma of 25 patients with CRC and 20 healthy controls. Both miR-17-3p and miR-92 were significantly elevated in the patients with CRC (p<0.0005). The plasma levels of these markers were significantly reduced after surgery in 10 patients with CRC (p<0.05). Further validation with an independent set of plasma samples (n = 180) indicated that miR-92 differentiates CRC from gastric cancer, IBD and normal subjects. This marker yielded a receiver operating characteristic curve area of 88.5%. At a cut-off of 240 (relative expression in comparison to RNU6B snRNA), the sensitivity was 89% and the specificity was 70% in discriminating CRC from control subjects. Conclusion: MiR-92 is significantly elevated in plasma of patients with CRC and can be a potential non-invasive molecular marker for CRC screening.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.2008.167817

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among the miRNA biomarkers examined, variation attributable to blood cell effects was greater in magnitude than many differences reported between cancer patients and controls.

    “we observed variation attributable to blood cell effects that was greater in magnitude than many of the differences reported between cancer patients and controls (13, 15, 20).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng, E. K. O., Chong, W. W. S., Jin, H., Lam, E. K. Y., Shin, V. Y., Yu, J., Poon, T. C. W., Ng, S. S. M., & Sung, J. J. Y.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2009-02-06
Volume
58
Issue
10
Pages
1375-1381
ISSN
  • 0017-5749
  • 1468-3288
Cited by
936
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review