Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Working Party proposal for a revised classification system of renal dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis

Open access
Wong, F., Nadim, M. K., Kellum, J. A., Salerno, F., Bellomo, R., Gerbes, A., Angeli, P., Moreau, R., Davenport, A., Jalan, R., Ronco, C., Genyk, Y., Arroyo, V.·2011·Gut

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To propose an improvement on the current classification of renal dysfunction in cirrhosis. Clinicians caring for patients with cirrhosis recognize that the development of renal dysfunction is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While most cases of renal dysfunction in cirrhosis are functional in nature, developed as a result of changes in haemodynamics, cardiac function, and renal auto-regulation, there is an increasing number of patients with cirrhosis and structural changes in their kidney as a cause of renal dysfunction. Therefore, there is a need for a newer classification to include both functional and structural renal diseases. DESIGN: A working party consisting of specialists from multiple disciplines conducted literature search and developed summary statements, incorporating the renal dysfunction classification used in nephrology. These were discussed and revised to produce this proposal. SETTING: Multi-disciplinary international meeting. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: Literature search using keywords of cirrhosis, renal dysfunction, acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney injury (CKD), and hepatorenal syndrome. RESULTS: Acute kidney injury will include all causes of acute deterioration of renal function as indicated by an increase in serum creatinine of >50% from baseline, or a rise in serum creatinine of ≥ 26.4 µmol/L (≥ 0.3 mg/dL) in < 48 hours. Chronic renal disease will be defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of < 60 ml/min calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 6 (MDRD6) formula, recognising that the MDRD6 formula is not perfect for the cirrhotic patients and this may change as improved means of estimating GFR becomes available. Acute on chronic kidney disease will be defined as AKI superimposed on existing chronic renal disease using the above definitions for AKI and CKD. CONCLUSIONS: Accepting this new classification will allow studies into the epidemiology, incidence, prevalence, natural history and the development of new treatments for these subtypes of renal dysfunction in cirrhosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.2010.236133

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Authors
Wong, F., Nadim, M. K., Kellum, J. A., Salerno, F., Bellomo, R., Gerbes, A., Angeli, P., Moreau, R., Davenport, A., Jalan, R., Ronco, C., Genyk, Y., & Arroyo, V.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-02-15
Volume
60
Issue
5
Pages
702-709
ISSN
0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148308926
Cited by
414
References
1
FWCI
22.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Working Party proposal for a revised classification system of renal dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.2010.236133
The paper
Wong, F., Nadim, M. K., Kellum, J. A., Salerno, F., Bellomo, R., Gerbes, A., Angeli, P., Moreau, R., Davenport, A., Jalan, R., Ronco, C., Genyk, Y., & Arroyo, V. (2011). Working Party proposal for a revised classification system of renal dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2010.236133

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.