Cited by 214Liver Diseases and ImmunityUrinary Tract Infections ManagementUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Bacteriuria and primary biliary cirrhosis.

Open access
Burroughs, A K, Rosenstein, I J, Epstein, O, Hamilton-Miller, J M, Brumfitt, W, Sherlock, S·1984·Gut

Abstract

Significant bacteriuria was found in 19% of 87 women with primary biliary cirrhosis, whereas in 89 women with other types of chronic liver disease bacteriuria was present in only 7%. In 74 women with rheumatoid arthritis 8% were bacteriuric. Midstream urine specimens obtained from 144 consecutive women with primary biliary cirrhosis attending hospital over a two year period showed that 50 (35%) developed bacteriuria during 12 months of follow up. Bacteriuria was unrelated to age, raised serum bilirubin, drug therapy or urinary pH but was more common in patients with late stage (fibrotic) disease as judged by histological criteria. Fifty seven per cent of bacteriuric primary biliary cirrhosis patients suffered more than one urinary infection. Fifty nine per cent of the 156 bacteriuric episodes were asymptomatic. The types of organism isolated, the antibiotic sensitivity patterns and cure rate were similar to those reported in bacteriuric women without other underlying disease. The reinfection rate (34%), however, was double that reported for bacteriuric episodes in 'problem' women with recurrent bacteriuria, indicating a special susceptibility to urinary infection. The most common isolates were E coli (70%), which did not show abnormal adhesiveness to uroepithelial or buccal cells of normal women, or to those of primary biliary cirrhosis patients. Patients with primary biliary cirrhosis have not been reported to be more susceptible to infection in general. Bacteriuria, however, was common throughout all clinical stages of primary biliary cirrhosis. Thus there may be a unique association between bacteriuria and primary biliary cirrhosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.25.2.133

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burroughs, A. K., Rosenstein, I. J., Epstein, O., Hamilton-Miller, J. M., Brumfitt, W., & Sherlock, S.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1984-02
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
133-137
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2036233591
Cited by
214
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
bacteriuria, primary biliary cirrhosis, urinary tract infection, Escherichia coli, asymptomatic bacteriuria, reinfection, fibrosis, chronic liver disease, women, infection susceptibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Bacteriuria, Escherichia coli, Female, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Liver Diseases, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review