The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Acid suppression in duodenal ulcer: a meta-analysis to define optimal dosing with antisecretory drugs.
Open accessAbstract
FVMany different dosage schedules of antisecretory drugs for the treatment of duodenal ulcer are recommended. The relationship between degree of acid suppression and therapeutic efficacy has not been precisely defined for these drugs. We have examined the association between suppression of intragastric acidity and duodenal ulcer healing rates for a number of therapeutic regimens. For the H2 receptor antagonists alone, the most significant correlation with healing rates was with suppression of intragastric acidity at night (r = 0.926; p = 0.0001). When other classes of drug: high dose antacid, omeprazole and a synthetic prostaglandin (enprostil) were included in the analysis, the closest correlation was with suppression of total 24 hour intragastric acidity (r = 0.911; p less than F0.0001). Stepwise linear regression analysis was used to investigate the relative contributions to healing of suppression of acidity during the day and night. Suppression of nocturnal acidity was found to be the single most important factor in explaining healing rates. No further benefit was obtained with daytime suppression for H2 receptor antagonists; suppression of acidity at night accounted for 86.1% of the observed variation in healing rates among different regimens of H2 receptor antagonists. When all classes of drugs were analysed, inclusion of daytime suppression produced a significant improvement in correlation over nocturnal suppression alone. Drug regimens providing potent suppression of nocturnal acidity produce the highest healing rates in controlled clinical trials. The healing rate for any dose regimen of an antisecretory drug can be predicted from a knowledge of its effect on intragastric acidity. For the H2 receptor antagonists, suppression of nocturnal acidity is the most relevant in this context. Moderate suppression of acidity achieves ulcer healing rates at four to eight weeks which are comparable with those seen with potent suppression at two to four weeks. Increasing degrees of suppression merely accelerate healing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cure of duodenal ulcer associated with eradication of Helicobacter pylori
Rauws, E. A. J., & Tytgat, G. N. J. (1990) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)91301-p · Cited by 922
Control of Gastric Acid Secretion in Health and Disease
Schubert, M. L., & Peura, D. A. (2008) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.05.021 · Cited by 481
Writing Committee Members, Abraham, N. S., Hlatky, M. A., Antman, E. M., Bhatt, D. L., Bjorkman, D. J., Clark, C. B., Furberg, C. D., Johnson, D. A., Kahi, C. J., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e318202f701 · Cited by 451
Is there an optimal degree of acid suppression for healing of duodenal ulcers?
Burget, D. W., Chiverton, S. G., & Hunt, R. H. (1990) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(90)91015-x · Cited by 340
Self-citationHuang, J.-Q., & Hunt, R. H. (2001) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/bega.2001.0184 · Cited by 127
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, D. B., Howden, C. W., Burget, D. W., Kerr, G. D., & Hunt, R. H.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1987-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1120-1127
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W1990846755
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acid suppression in duodenal ulcer: a meta-analysis to define optimal dosing with antisecretory drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.28.9.1120
- The paper
- Jones, D. B., Howden, C. W., Burget, D. W., Kerr, G. D., & Hunt, R. H. (1987). Acid suppression in duodenal ulcer: a meta-analysis to define optimal dosing with antisecretory drugs. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.28.9.1120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.