The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dyspepsia in England and Scotland.
Open accessAbstract
A validated postal questionnaire has been used to establish the prevalence of dyspeptic symptoms in five geographical locations from the south coast of England to the north of Scotland. The six month period prevalence of dyspepsia in the 7428 respondents to the questionnaire is 41% and equal between the sexes, with similar prevalence rates in the centres studied. There is considerable overlap between upper abdominal symptoms and symptoms of heartburn; 56% of patients with dyspepsia experience both groups of symptoms. Symptom frequency falls progressively with age in men and women, but the proportion of people seeking medical advice for dyspepsia rises with age. One quarter of the dyspeptic patients studied have consulted a general practitioner about their symptoms. This study suggests that the prevalence of dyspepsia in the community has changed little over the last 30 years, despite evidence that the frequency of peptic ulcer disease is falling. Symptom prevalence is unrelated to social class, but this factor is associated with consultation behaviour, the consultation rate rising from 17% in social class 1 to 29% in social class 4. The use of investigations--barium meal and endoscopy--is similarly related to social class; the lowest rate for ulcer diagnosis (4.7%) is found in social class 1 and the highest (17.1%) in social class 5.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Agréus, L., Svärdsudd, K., Nyrén, O., & Tibblin, G. (1995) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(95)90373-9 · Cited by 686
Diagnostic Difficulty and Error in Primary Care—A Systematic Review
Kostopoulou, O., Delaney, B. C., & Munro, C. W. (2008) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn071 · Cited by 200
Kennedy, T. M., Jones, R. H., Hungin, A. P. S., O’Flanagan, H., & Kelly, P. (1998) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.43.6.770 · Cited by 199
Self-citationA community-based, controlled study of the epidemiology and pathophysiology of dyspepsia
Castillo, E. J., Camilleri, M., Locke, G. R., Burton, D. D., Stephens, D. A., Geno, D. M., & Zinsmeister, A. R. (2004) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00454-9 · Cited by 150
Dyspepsia: Organic Versus Functional
Oustamanolakis, P., & Tack, J. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mcg.0b013e318241b335 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, R. H., Lydeard, S. E., Hobbs, F. D., Kenkre, J. E., Williams, E. I., Jones, S. J., Repper, J. A., Caldow, J. L., Dunwoodie, W. M., & Bottomley, J. M.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1990-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 401-405
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2103706471
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dyspepsia in England and Scotland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.31.4.401
- The paper
- Jones, R. H., Lydeard, S. E., Hobbs, F. D., Kenkre, J. E., Williams, E. I., Jones, S. J., Repper, J. A., Caldow, J. L., Dunwoodie, W. M., & Bottomley, J. M. (1990). Dyspepsia in England and Scotland. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.31.4.401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.