Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 819

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Natural history and prognostic factors in 305 Swedish patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Open access
Broomé, U, Olsson, R, Lööf, L, Bodemar, G, Hultcrantz, R, Danielsson, A, Prytz, H, Sandberg-Gertzén, H, Wallerstedt, S, Lindberg, G·1996·Gut

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS--The course of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is highly variable and unpredictable. This study describes the natural history and outcome of PSC. These data were used to construct a prognostic model for patients with PSC. METHODS--A total of 305 Swedish patients with PSC were studied. The median follow up time was 63 (1-194) months and all patients could be traced for follow up. Some 79 patients died or had a liver transplant. The prognostic significance of clinical, biochemical, and histological findings at the time of diagnosis were evaluated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS--The estimated median survival from time of diagnosis to death or liver transplantation was 12 years. Cholangiocarcinoma was found in 24 (8%) of the patients and 134 (44%) of the patients were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. The estimated survival rate was significantly higher in the asymptomatic group (p < 0.001). However, 29 (22%) of the asymptomatic patients became symptomatic during the study period. It was found that age, serum bilirubin concentration, and histological stage at the time of diagnosis were independent predictors of a bad prognosis. These variables were used to construct a prognostic model. CONCLUSIONS--This prognostic model developed from a large homogeneous population of PSC patients should be of value for the timing of transplantation and patient counselling in PSC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.38.4.610

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 819

Metadata

Authors
Broomé, U., Olsson, R., Lööf, L., Bodemar, G., Hultcrantz, R., Danielsson, A., Prytz, H., Sandberg-Gertzén, H., Wallerstedt, S., & Lindberg, G.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1996-04
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
610-615
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2026781960
Cited by
819
References
27
FWCI
11.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural history and prognostic factors in 305 Swedish patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.38.4.610
The paper
Broomé, U., Olsson, R., Lööf, L., Bodemar, G., Hultcrantz, R., Danielsson, A., Prytz, H., Sandberg-Gertzén, H., Wallerstedt, S., & Lindberg, G. (1996). Natural history and prognostic factors in 305 Swedish patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.38.4.610

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.