Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 732

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis: a review of its clinical features, cholangiography, and hepatic histology.

Open access
Chapman, R W, Arborgh, B A, Rhodes, J M, Summerfield, J A, Dick, R, Scheuer, P J, Sherlock, S·1980·Gut

Abstract

Twenty-nine patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis were reviewed. Males predominated (2:1). Seventy-six per cent presented with cholestasis and cholangitis, 17% with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, and 7% were asymptomatic, presenting with a raised serum alkaline phosphatase. The serum immunoglobulin IgM concentration was raised in 45% of the patients, but no patient had serum mitochondrial antibody present. Seventy-two per cent had ulcerative proctocolitis. There was no relationship between either duration or severity of ulcerative proctocolitis and the development of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Four patients were not benefited by colectomy. None of the patients ahd Crohn's disease. The prognosis was variable. Corticosteriods and azathioprine were ineffective. Eleven patients (38%) had died with a mean survival time of seven years from diagnosis. Three patients with ulcerative proctocolitis developed bile duct carcinoma. The cholangiograms and liver biopsies were reported without reference to clinical information together with 41 patients with other biliary diseases. Cholangiography was diagnostic in 18/22 (82%). Hepatic histology was diagnostic in 8/22 (36%). Ten showed features of large bile duct disease and three were misdiagnosed as primary biliary cirrhosis. Reduced numbers of bile ducts, ductular proliferation, portal inflammation, and substantial copper deposition, in combination with piecemeal necrosis, are commonly seen in primary sclerosing cholangitis and indicate the need for cholangiography.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.21.10.870

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 732

Metadata

Authors
Chapman, R. W., Arborgh, B. A., Rhodes, J. M., Summerfield, J. A., Dick, R., Scheuer, P. J., & Sherlock, S.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1980-10
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
870-877
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2102495280
Cited by
732
References
2
FWCI
13.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary sclerosing cholangitis: a review of its clinical features, cholangiography, and hepatic histology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.21.10.870
The paper
Chapman, R. W., Arborgh, B. A., Rhodes, J. M., Summerfield, J. A., Dick, R., Scheuer, P. J., & Sherlock, S. (1980). Primary sclerosing cholangitis: a review of its clinical features, cholangiography, and hepatic histology. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.21.10.870

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.