The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two phase randomised controlled clinical trial of postoperative oral dietary supplements in surgical patients.
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Previous work has shown that the administration of oral dietary supplements to patients who have undergone gastrointestinal surgery results in clinically significant short term benefits. AIMS: This study aimed firstly to re-evaluate these short term effects, and secondly to establish whether there are any long term benefits. SUBJECTS: One hundred patients admitted for elective moderate or major gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: In the inpatient phase, patients were randomised to receive a normal ward diet postoperatively, or the same diet supplemented with an oral dietary supplement. In the outpatient phase, patients were further randomised to receive their home diet, or their home diet supplemented with the oral dietary supplement for four months. RESULTS: During the inpatient phase, patients treated with oral supplements had a significantly improved nutritional intake and lost less weight (2.2, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.9 kg) compared with control patients (4.2 (0.78) kg, p < 0.001). Supplemented patients maintained their hand grip strength whereas control patients showed a significant reduction in grip strength (p < 0.01). Subjective levels of fatigue increased significantly above preoperative levels in control patients (p < 0.01) but not in the supplemented group. Twelve patients in the control group developed complications compared with four in the supplemented group (p < 0.05). In the outpatient phase, supplemented patients had improved nutrient intakes but there were no significant differences in indices of nutritional status or wellbeing between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The prescription of oral dietary supplements to patients who have undergone gastrointestinal surgery results in clinically significant benefits. These benefits, however, are restricted to the inpatient phase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Protein Status of General Surgical Patients
Bistrian, B. R. (1974) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1974.03240060028025 · Cited by 822
WOO, J., HO, S. C., MAK, Y. T., LAW, L. K., & CHEUNG, A. (1994) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/23.1.40 · Cited by 118
Cited by
KONDRUP, J. (2003) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/s0261-5614(02)00214-5 · Cited by 3,063
Protein and energy supplementation in elderly people at risk from malnutrition
Milne, A. C., Potter, J., Vivanti, A., & Avenell, A. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003288.pub3 · Cited by 849
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of high protein oral nutritional supplements
Cawood, A. L., Elia, M., & Stratton, R. J. (2012) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2011.12.008 · Cited by 376
Van Ancum, J. M., Scheerman, K., Jonkman, N. H., Smeenk, H. E., Kruizinga, R. C., Meskers, C. G. M., & Maier, A. B. (2017) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2017.03.006 · Cited by 118
Protein and energy supplementation in elderly people at risk from malnutrition
Milne, A. C., Potter, J., & Avenell, A. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003288.pub2 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Keele, A. M., Bray, M. J., Emery, P. W., Duncan, H. D., & Silk, D. B.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 393-399
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2030252533
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two phase randomised controlled clinical trial of postoperative oral dietary supplements in surgical patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.40.3.393
- The paper
- Keele, A. M., Bray, M. J., Emery, P. W., Duncan, H. D., & Silk, D. B. (1997). Two phase randomised controlled clinical trial of postoperative oral dietary supplements in surgical patients. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.40.3.393
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.