The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Impact of endoscopic biopsy surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus on pathological stage and clinical outcome of Barrett’s carcinoma
Open accessAbstract
Background —The efficacy of endoscopic biopsy surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus in reducing mortality from oesophageal cancer has not been confirmed. Aims —To investigate the impact of endoscopic biopsy surveillance on pathological stage and clinical outcome of Barrett’s carcinoma. Methods —A clinicopathological comparison was made between patients who initially presented with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (n=54), and those in whom the cancer had been detected during surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus (n=16). Results —The surveyed patients were known to have Barrett’s oesophagus for a median period of 42 months (range 6–144 months). Prior to the detection of adenocarcinoma or high grade dysplasia, 13 of 16 patients (81%) were previously found to have low grade dysplasia. Surgical pathology showed that surveyed patients had significantly earlier stages than non-surveyed patients (p=0.0001). Only one surveyed patient (6%) versus 34 non-surveyed patients (63%) had nodal involvement (p=0.0001). Two year survival was 85.9% for surveyed patients and 43.3% for non-surveyed patients (p=0.0029). Conclusions —The temporal course of histological progression in our surveyed patients supports the theory that adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus develops through stages of increasing severity of dysplasia. Endoscopic biopsy surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus permits detection of malignancy at an early and curable stage, thereby potentially reducing mortality from oesophageal adenocarcinoma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Near‐infrared Raman spectroscopy for the classification of epithelial pre‐cancers and cancers
Stone, N., Kendall, C., Shepherd, N., Crow, P., & Barr, H. (2002) · Journal of Raman Spectroscopy · doi:10.1002/jrs.882 · Cited by 472
Endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early stage cancer in Barrett's esophagus
Peters, F. P., Kara, M. A., Rosmolen, W. D., Aalders, M. C. G., ten Kate, F. J. W., Bultje, B. C., Krishnadath, K. K., Fockens, P., van Lanschot, J. J. B., van Deventer, S. J. H., et al. (2005) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/s0016-5107(05)00063-5 · Cited by 172
Risk Factors for the Development of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Barrett's Esophagus
de Jonge, P. J. F., Steyerberg, E. W., Kuipers, E. J., Honkoop, P., Wolters, L. M. M., Kerkhof, M., van Dekken, H., & Siersema, P. D. (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00626.x · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- van Sandick, J. W., van Lanschot, J. J. B., Kuiken, B. W., Tytgat, G. N. J., Offerhaus, G. J. A., & Obertop, H.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1998-08-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 216-222
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2114451330
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of endoscopic biopsy surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus on pathological stage and clinical outcome of Barrett’s carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.43.2.216
- The paper
- van Sandick, J. W., van Lanschot, J. J. B., Kuiken, B. W., Tytgat, G. N. J., Offerhaus, G. J. A., & Obertop, H. (1998). Impact of endoscopic biopsy surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus on pathological stage and clinical outcome of Barrett’s carcinoma. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.43.2.216
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.