Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 393

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Impact of endoscopic biopsy surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus on pathological stage and clinical outcome of Barrett’s carcinoma

Open access
van Sandick, J W, van Lanschot, J J B, Kuiken, B W, Tytgat, G N J, Offerhaus, G J A, Obertop, H·1998·Gut

Abstract

Background —The efficacy of endoscopic biopsy surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus in reducing mortality from oesophageal cancer has not been confirmed. Aims —To investigate the impact of endoscopic biopsy surveillance on pathological stage and clinical outcome of Barrett’s carcinoma. Methods —A clinicopathological comparison was made between patients who initially presented with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (n=54), and those in whom the cancer had been detected during surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus (n=16). Results —The surveyed patients were known to have Barrett’s oesophagus for a median period of 42 months (range 6–144 months). Prior to the detection of adenocarcinoma or high grade dysplasia, 13 of 16 patients (81%) were previously found to have low grade dysplasia. Surgical pathology showed that surveyed patients had significantly earlier stages than non-surveyed patients (p=0.0001). Only one surveyed patient (6%) versus 34 non-surveyed patients (63%) had nodal involvement (p=0.0001). Two year survival was 85.9% for surveyed patients and 43.3% for non-surveyed patients (p=0.0029). Conclusions —The temporal course of histological progression in our surveyed patients supports the theory that adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus develops through stages of increasing severity of dysplasia. Endoscopic biopsy surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus permits detection of malignancy at an early and curable stage, thereby potentially reducing mortality from oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.43.2.216

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 393

Metadata

Authors
van Sandick, J. W., van Lanschot, J. J. B., Kuiken, B. W., Tytgat, G. N. J., Offerhaus, G. J. A., & Obertop, H.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1998-08-01
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
216-222
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2114451330
Cited by
393
References
0
FWCI
19.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of endoscopic biopsy surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus on pathological stage and clinical outcome of Barrett’s carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.43.2.216
The paper
van Sandick, J. W., van Lanschot, J. J. B., Kuiken, B. W., Tytgat, G. N. J., Offerhaus, G. J. A., & Obertop, H. (1998). Impact of endoscopic biopsy surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus on pathological stage and clinical outcome of Barrett’s carcinoma. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.43.2.216

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.