The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wheat bran affects the site of fermentation of resistant starch and luminal indexes related to colon cancer risk: a study in pigs
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that resistant starch (effective in producing butyrate and lowering possibly toxic ammonia) is rapidly fermented in the proximal colon; the distal colon especially would, however, benefit from these properties of resistant starch. AIMS: To determine whether wheat bran (a rich source of insoluble non-starch polysaccharides), known to hasten gastrointestinal transit, could carry resistant starch through to the distal colon and thus shift its site of fermentation. METHODS: Twenty four pigs were fed four human type diets: a control diet, or control diet supplemented with resistant starch, wheat bran, or both. Intestinal contents and faeces were collected after two weeks. RESULTS: Without wheat bran, resistant starch was rapidly fermented in the caecum and proximal colon. Supplementation with wheat bran inhibited the caecal fermentation of resistant starch, resulting in an almost twofold increase (from 12.9 (2.5) to 20.5 (2.1) g/day, p<0.05) in resistant starch being fermented between the proximal colon and faeces. This resulted in higher butyrate (133%, p<0.05) and lower ammonia (81%, p<0.05) concentrations in the distal colonic regions. CONCLUSIONS: Wheat bran can shift the fermentation of resistant starch further distally, thereby improving the luminal conditions in the distal colonic regions where tumours most commonly occur. Therefore, the combined consumption of resistant starch and insoluble non-starch polysaccharides may contribute to the dietary modulation of colon cancer risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effects of short chain fatty acids on gut morphology and function
Scheppach, W. (1994) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.35.1_suppl.s35 · Cited by 756
Cited by
The microbiology of butyrate formation in the human colon
Pryde, S. E., Duncan, S. H., Hold, G. L., Stewart, C. S., & Flint, H. J. (2002) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11467.x · Cited by 1,320
Dietary fibre in gastrointestinal health and disease
Gill, S. K., Rossi, M., Bajka, B., & Whelan, K. (2021) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-020-00375-4 · Cited by 979
Khan, I., Ullah, N., Zha, L., Bai, Y., Khan, A., Zhao, T., Che, T., & Zhang, C. (2019) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens8030126 · Cited by 771
Salonen, A., Lahti, L., Salojärvi, J., Holtrop, G., Korpela, K., Duncan, S. H., Date, P., Farquharson, F., Johnstone, A. M., Lobley, G. E., et al. (2014) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.63 · Cited by 626
Gill, P. A., van Zelm, M. C., Muir, J. G., & Gibson, P. R. (2018) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.14689 · Cited by 520
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Govers, M. J. A. P., Gannon, N. J., Dunshea, F. R., Gibson, P. R., & Muir, J. G.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1999-12-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 840-847
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W1982326597
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wheat bran affects the site of fermentation of resistant starch and luminal indexes related to colon cancer risk: a study in pigs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.45.6.840
- The paper
- Govers, M. J. A. P., Gannon, N. J., Dunshea, F. R., Gibson, P. R., & Muir, J. G. (1999). Wheat bran affects the site of fermentation of resistant starch and luminal indexes related to colon cancer risk: a study in pigs. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.45.6.840
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.