The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Value of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses
Open accessAbstract
AIM: To assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNAB) in patients with solid pancreatic masses. METHODS: Ninety nine consecutive patients with pancreatic masses were studied. Histological findings obtained by EUS-FNAB were compared with the final diagnosis assessed by surgery, biopsy of other tumour site or at postmortem examination, or by using a combination of clinical course, imaging features, and tumour markers. RESULTS: EUS-FNAB was feasible in 90 patients (adenocarcinomas, n = 59; neuroendocrine tumours, n = 15; various neoplasms, n = 6; pancreatitis, n = 10), and analysable material was obtained in 73. Tumour size (⩾ or < 25 mm in diameter) did not influence the ability to obtain informative biopsy samples. Diagnostic accuracy was 74.4% (adenocarcinomas, 81.4%; neuroendocrine tumours, 46.7%; other lesions, 75%; p<0.02). Overall, the diagnostic yield in all 99 patients was 68%. Successful biopsies were performed in six patients with portal hypertension. Minor complications (moderate bleeding or pain) occurred in 5% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNAB is a useful and safe method for the investigation of pancreatic masses, with a high feasibility rate even when lesions are small. Overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNAB seems to depend on the tumour type.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pancreatic involvement in von Hippel–Lindau disease
Hammel, P. R., Vilgrain, V., Terris, B., Penfornis, A., Sauvanet, A., Correas, J., Chauveau, D., Balian, A., Beigelman, C., O'Toole, D., et al. (2000) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2000.18143 · Cited by 426
Self-citationEloubeidi, M. A., Jhala, D., Chhieng, D. C., Chen, V. K., Eltoum, I., Vickers, S., Mel Wilcox, C., & Jhala, N. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11643 · Cited by 332
Endoscopic ultrasound in the localisation of pancreatic islet cell tumours.
McLean, A. M., & Fairclough, P. D. (2005) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.beem.2004.11.012 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Voss, M., Hammel, P., Molas, G., Palazzo, L., Dancour, A., O'Toole, D., Terris, B., Degott, C., Bernades, P., & Ruszniewski, P.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-02-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 244-249
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2108630285
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Value of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.46.2.244
- The paper
- Voss, M., Hammel, P., Molas, G., Palazzo, L., Dancour, A., O'Toole, D., Terris, B., Degott, C., Bernades, P., & Ruszniewski, P. (2000). Value of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.46.2.244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.