The DOI matches its Crossref record.
No harm from five year ingestion of oats in coeliac disease
Open accessAbstract
Background: Six to 12 months of ingestion of moderate amounts of oats does not have a harmful effect in adult patients with coeliac disease. As the safety of long term intake of oats in coeliac patients is not known, we continued our previous 6–12 month study for five years. Aim: To assess the safety of long term ingestion of oats in the diet of coeliac patients. Patients: In our previous study, the effects of a gluten free diet and a gluten free diet including oats were compared in a randomised trial involving 92 adult patients with coeliac disease (45 in the oats group, 47 in the control group). After the initial phase of 6–12 months, patients in the oats group were allowed to eat oats freely in conjunction with an otherwise gluten free diet. After five years, 35 patients in the original oats group (23 still on an oats diet) and 28 in the control group on a conventional gluten free diet were examined. Methods: Clinical and nutritional assessment, duodenal biopsies for conventional histopathology and histomorphometry, and measurement of antiendomysial, antireticulin, and antigliadin antibodies. Results: There were no significant differences between controls and those patients consuming oats with respect to duodenal villous architecture, inflammatory cell infiltration of the duodenal mucosa, or antibody titres after five years of follow up. In both groups histological and histomorphometric indexes improved equally with time. Conclusions: This study provides the first evidence of the long term safety of oats as part of a coeliac diet in adult patients with coeliac disease. It also appears that the majority of coeliac patients prefer oats in their diet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Green, P. H., & Jabri, B. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14027-5 · Cited by 730
Nonmeat Protein Alternatives as Meat Extenders and Meat Analogs
Asgar, M. A., Fazilah, A., Huda, N., Bhat, R., & Karim, A. A. (2010) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00124.x · Cited by 505
The Gluten-Free Diet: Safety and Nutritional Quality
Saturni, L., Ferretti, G., & Bacchetti, T. (2010) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu2010016 · Cited by 392
Celiac disease: pathogenesis of a model immunogenetic disease
Kagnoff, M. F. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci30253 · Cited by 386
Dietary guidelines and implementation for celiac disease
Kupper, C. (2005) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.024 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Janatuinen, E. K., Kemppainen, T. A., Julkunen, R. J. K., Kosma, V.-M., Mäki, M., Heikkinen, M., & Uusitupa, M. I. J.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 332-335
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2096742758
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: No harm from five year ingestion of oats in coeliac disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.50.3.332
- The paper
- Janatuinen, E. K., Kemppainen, T. A., Julkunen, R. J. K., Kosma, V.-M., Mäki, M., Heikkinen, M., & Uusitupa, M. I. J. (2002). No harm from five year ingestion of oats in coeliac disease. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.50.3.332
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.