The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Results of national registration of familial adenomatous polyposis
Open accessAbstract
Background and aims: The Danish Polyposis Register was established in 1971 with the aim of improving the poor prognosis of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and in 1975 the register became national. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of colorectal cancer and survival rate in FAP patients before and after the establishment of the Danish Polyposis Register. Patients and methods: The Danish Polyposis Register was established by collecting information on probands and construction of their pedigrees. Family members at risk were offered prophylactic endoscopic and molecular genetic examination, and affected individuals were treated by colectomy. Results: At the end of 2001, the Danish Polyposis Register included 434 patients from 165 families. The incidence rate was 1.90×10 −6 and the prevalence rate 4.65×10 −5 . Colorectal cancer on the basis of FAP constituted 0.07% of all colorectal cancers in the 1990s. Colorectal cancer was diagnosed in 170/252 probands (67%) and in 5/182 call-up patients (3%) (p<0.001). The cumulative crude survival was 94% in call-up patients compared with 44% in probands (p<0.0001). A comparison of two periods, 1900–1975 and 1976–2001, demonstrated a decreased prevalence of colorectal cancer from 60% to 27% (p<0.0001), and an increased use of colectomy from 52% to 93% (p<0.00001). The cumulative crude survival in FAP showed substantial improvement with time (p<0.00001). Conclusion: Since the establishment of the Danish Polyposis Register, the prevalence of colorectal cancer has decreased considerably and the prognosis has improved substantially. The work of the Danish Polyposis Register is probably the main cause of this improvement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Syngal, S., Brand, R. E., Church, J. M., Giardiello, F. M., Hampel, H. L., & Burt, R. W. (2015) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.435 · Cited by 1,662
Evans, D. G., Howard, E., Giblin, C., Clancy, T., Spencer, H., Huson, S. M., & Lalloo, F. (2010) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.33139 · Cited by 988
Familial adenomatous polyposis
Galiatsatos, P., & Foulkes, W. D. (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00375.x · Cited by 757
Waljee, A., Waljee, J., Morris, A. M., & Higgins, P. D. R. (2006) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2005.090316 · Cited by 375
Extra-Intestinal Manifestations of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
Groen, E. J., Roos, A., Muntinghe, F. L., Enting, R. H., de Vries, J., Kleibeuker, J. H., Witjes, M. J. H., Links, T. P., & van Beek, A. P. (2008) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-008-9981-3 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Bülow, S.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 742-746
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2117335001
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Results of national registration of familial adenomatous polyposis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.52.5.742
- The paper
- Bülow, S. (2003). Results of national registration of familial adenomatous polyposis. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.52.5.742
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.