Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 609

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus: a meta-analysis

Desai, Tusar K, Krishnan, Kumar, Samala, Niharika, Singh, Jashanpreet, Cluley, John, Perla, Subaiah, Howden, Colin W·2012·Gut

Abstract

Introduction: The risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) in non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus (BO) may have been overestimated. The objective was to estimate the incidence of OAC in patients with BO without dysplasia. Methods: The authors searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 to 2011 and performed a bibliographic review of previous publications, excluding abstracts, non-peer-reviewed publications and those not published in English, for prospective or retrospective studies of the incidence of OAC in patients with BO. They excluded patients with any degree of dysplasia at baseline and those without documented intestinal metaplasia. Studies were independently reviewed by two individuals. 57 of 3450 studies were included. The authors extracted information on number of patients with BO, length of follow-up, incident cases of OAC, mean age of patients, country of origin, whether prospective or retrospective, mean length of BO segments and mortality from causes other than OAC. Study quality was assessed by the Ottawa Newcastle criteria. Results: The 57 included studies comprised 11 434 patients and 58 547 patient-years of follow-up. The pooled annual incidence of OAC was 0.33% (95% CI 0.28% to 0.38%). Among 16 studies that provided appropriate information on mortality, there were 56 incident cases of OAC but 684 deaths from apparently unrelated causes. Among 16 studies that provided information on patients with short-segment BO, the annual incidence of OAC was only 0.19%. Conclusions: The incidence of OAC in non-dysplastic BO is around 1 per 300 patients per year. The incidence of OAC in short-segment BO is under 1 per 500 patients per year.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300730

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Medication Usage and the Risk of Neoplasia in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus

    Nguyen, D. M., El-Serag, H. B., Henderson, L., Stein, D., Bhattacharyya, A., & Sampliner, R. E. (2009) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.001 · Cited by 159 · cited 4×

    “Ten studies were considered to be of the highest quality in that they had no evidence of selection bias, more than 5 years of mean follow-up and at least 1 year of minimum follow-up.(4) 65 66 74 76 79 84 95 110 111 These comprised 3345 patients and 23 984 patient-years of follow-up.”
    BackgroundInfluential

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 609

Metadata

Authors
Desai, T. K., Krishnan, K., Samala, N., Singh, J., Cluley, J., Perla, S., & Howden, C. W.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-10-13
Volume
61
Issue
7
Pages
970-976
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2161179649
Cited by
609
References
1
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus: a meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300730
The paper
Desai, T. K., Krishnan, K., Samala, N., Singh, J., Cluley, J., Perla, S., & Howden, C. W. (2012). The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus: a meta-analysis. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300730

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.