The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus after acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is common in the general population and it poses a heavy burden to society in the form of long-term disability, healthcare use and costs. The pancreas is a key player in glucose homeostasis, but the occurrence of newly diagnosed DM after acute pancreatitis (AP), the most frequent disease of the pancreas, has never been assessed systematically. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to determine the prevalence and time course of DM and related conditions after the first attack of AP as well as the impact of covariates. Methods: Relevant literature cited in three electronic databases (Scopus, EMBASE and MEDLINE) was reviewed independently by two authors. The main outcome measures studied were newly diagnosed prediabetes, DM, or DM treated with insulin. Pooled prevalence and 95% CIs were calculated for all outcomes. Results: A total of 24 prospective clinical studies, involving 1102 patients with first episode of AP, met all the eligibility criteria. Prediabetes and/or DM was observed in 37% (95% CI 30% to 45%) individuals after AP. The pooled prevalence of prediabetes, DM and treatment with insulin after AP was 16% (95% CI 9% to 24%), 23% (95% CI 16% to 31%), and 15% (95% CI 9% to 21%), respectively. Newly diagnosed DM developed in 15% of individuals within 12 months after first episode of AP and the risk increased significantly at 5 years (relative risk 2.7 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.8)). A similar trend was observed with regard to treatment with insulin. The severity of AP, its aetiology, individuals’ age and gender had minimal effect on the studied outcomes. Conclusions: Patients with AP often develop prediabetes and/or DM after discharge from hospital, and have a greater than twofold increased risk of DM over 5 years. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal strategy for its detection and whether the risk of developing DM after AP can be reduced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17,633
International Diabetes Federation 2017
Carracher, A. M., Marathe, P. H., & Close, K. L. (2018) · Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1111/1753-0407.12644 · Cited by 13,418
Tuomilehto, J., Lindström, J., Eriksson, J. G., Valle, T. T., Hämäläinen, H., Ilanne-Parikka, P., Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, S., Laakso, M., Louheranta, A., Rastas, M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105033441801 · Cited by 10,873
The metabolic syndrome—a new worldwide definition
Alberti, K. G. M., Zimmet, P., & Shaw, J. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67402-8 · Cited by 9,352
Cited by
Boxhoorn, L., Voermans, R. P., Bouwense, S. A., Bruno, M. J., Verdonk, R. C., Boermeester, M. A., van Santvoort, H. C., & Besselink, M. G. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31310-6 · Cited by 1,049
Global epidemiology and holistic prevention of pancreatitis
Petrov, M. S., & Yadav, D. (2019) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-018-0087-5 · Cited by 915
Self-citationAmerican Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc22-s004 · Cited by 285
Woodmansey, C., McGovern, A. P., McCullough, K. A., Whyte, M. B., Munro, N. M., Correa, A. C., Gatenby, P. A. C., Jones, S. A., & de Lusignan, S. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc17-0542 · Cited by 280
Gao, Y., Mi, N., Wu, W., Zhao, Y., Fan, F., Liao, W., Ming, Y., Guan, W., & Bai, C. (2024) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1002/jev2.12410 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Das, S. L. M., Singh, P. P., Phillips, A. R. J., Murphy, R., Windsor, J. A., & Petrov, M. S.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2013-08-08
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 818-831
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2147227928
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus after acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305062
- The paper
- Das, S. L. M., Singh, P. P., Phillips, A. R. J., Murphy, R., Windsor, J. A., & Petrov, M. S. (2014). Newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus after acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.