The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Definition and taxonomy of interval colorectal cancers: a proposal for standardising nomenclature
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Interval colorectal cancers (interval CRCs), that is, cancers occurring after a negative screening test or examination, are an important indicator of the quality and effectiveness of CRC screening and surveillance. In order to compare incidence rates of interval CRCs across screening programmes, a standardised definition is required. Our goal was to develop an internationally applicable definition and taxonomy for reporting on interval CRCs . Design: Using a modified Delphi process to achieve consensus, the Expert Working Group on interval CRC of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Committee of the World Endoscopy Organization developed a nomenclature for defining and characterising interval CRCs . Results: We define an interval CRC as a “colorectal cancer diagnosed after a screening or surveillance exam in which no cancer is detected, and before the date of the next recommended exam”. Guidelines and principles for describing and reporting on interval CRCs are provided, and clinical scenarios to demonstrate the practical application of the nomenclature are presented. Conclusions: The Working Group on interval CRC of the World Endoscopy Organization endorses adoption of this standardised nomenclature. A standardised nomenclature will facilitate benchmarking and comparison of interval CRC rates across programmes and regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death
Corley, D. A., Jensen, C. D., Marks, A. R., Zhao, W. K., Lee, J. K., Doubeni, C. A., Zauber, A. G., de Boer, J., Fireman, B. H., Schottinger, J. E., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1309086 · Cited by 2,270
Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy
Nishihara, R., Wu, K., Lochhead, P., Morikawa, T., Liao, X., Qian, Z. R., Inamura, K., Kim, S. A., Kuchiba, A., Yamauchi, M., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1301969 · Cited by 1,483
Cited by
Colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines
Saito, Y., Oka, S., Kawamura, T., Shimoda, R., Sekiguchi, M., Tamai, N., Hotta, K., Matsuda, T., Misawa, M., Tanaka, S., et al. (2021) · Digestive Endoscopy · doi:10.1111/den.13972 · Cited by 170
Interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: exploring explanations and solutions
Adler, J., & Robertson, D. J. (2015) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2015.365 · Cited by 129
Klatte, D. C. F., Boekestijn, B., Wasser, M. N. J. M., Feshtali Shahbazi, S., Ibrahim, I. S., Mieog, J. S. D., Luelmo, S. A. C., Morreau, H., Potjer, T. P., Inderson, A., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.22.00194 · Cited by 102
Sessile serrated polyps and colon cancer prevention
Rashtak, S., Rego, R., Sweetser, S. R., & Sinicrope, F. A. (2017) · Cancer Prevention Research · doi:10.1158/1940-6207.capr-16-0264 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanduleanu, S., le Clercq, C. M. C., Dekker, E., Meijer, G. A., Rabeneck, L., Rutter, M. D., Valori, R., Young, G. P., & Schoen, R. E.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2014-09-05
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1257-1267
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2161185314
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Definition and taxonomy of interval colorectal cancers: a proposal for standardising nomenclature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307992
- The paper
- Sanduleanu, S., le Clercq, C. M. C., Dekker, E., Meijer, G. A., Rabeneck, L., Rutter, M. D., Valori, R., Young, G. P., & Schoen, R. E. (2015). Definition and taxonomy of interval colorectal cancers: a proposal for standardising nomenclature. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307992
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
