The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Survival of patients with a new diagnosis of heart failure: a population based study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the survival of a population based cohort of patients with incident (new) heart failure and the clinical features associated with mortality. DESIGN: A population based observational study. SETTING: Population of 151 000 served by 82 general practitioners in west London. PATIENTS: New cases of heart failure were identified by daily surveillance of acute hospital admissions to the local district general hospital, and by general practitioner referral of all suspected new cases of heart failure to a rapid access clinic. INTERVENTIONS: All patients with suspected heart failure underwent clinical assessment, and chest radiography, ECG, and echocardiogram were performed. A panel of three cardiologists reviewed all the data and determined whether the definition of heart failure had been met. Patients were subsequently managed by the general practitioner in consultation with the local cardiologist or admitting physician. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Death, overall and from cardiovascular causes. RESULTS: There were 90 deaths (83 cardiovascular deaths) in the cohort of 220 patients with incident heart failure over a median follow up of 16 months. Survival was 81% at one month, 75% at three months, 70% at six months, 62% at 12 months, and 57% at 18 months. Lower systolic blood pressure, higher serum creatinine concentration, and greater extent of crackles on auscultation of the lungs were independently predictive of cardiovascular mortality (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with new heart failure, mortality is high in the first few weeks after diagnosis. Simple clinical features can identify a group of patients at especially high risk of death.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The SOLVD Investigators* (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108013250501 · Cited by 8,029
Cited by
Roger, V. L. (2013) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.113.300268 · Cited by 1,728
Stewart, S., Hart, C. L., Hole, D. J., & McMurray, J. J. V. (2002) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01236-6 · Cited by 1,562
Bernardo, B. C., Weeks, K. L., Pretorius, L., & McMullen, J. R. (2010) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.04.005 · Cited by 894
Doust, J. A., Pietrzak, E., Dobson, A., & Glasziou, P. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7492.625 · Cited by 710
Mant, J., Doust, J., Roalfe, A., Barton, P., Cowie, M., Glasziou, P., Mant, D., McManus, R., Holder, R., Deeks, J., et al. (2009) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta13320 · Cited by 498
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowie, M. R., Wood, D. A., Coats, A. J. S., Thompson, S. G., Suresh, V, Poole-Wilson, P. A., & Sutton, G. C.
- Venue
- Heart
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 505-510
- ISSN
- 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-201X
- OpenAlex
- W2148783699
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival of patients with a new diagnosis of heart failure: a population based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/heart.83.5.505
- The paper
- Cowie, M. R., Wood, D. A., Coats, A. J. S., Thompson, S. G., Suresh, V, Poole-Wilson, P. A., & Sutton, G. C. (2000). Survival of patients with a new diagnosis of heart failure: a population based study. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.83.5.505
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.