Cited by 114Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Orthostatic hypotension and mortality risk: a meta-analysis of cohort studies

Xin, Wei, Lin, Zhiqin, Mi, Shuhua·2014·Heart

Abstract

Context: Orthostatic hypotension (OH) has been found to be related to increased risk of mortality, although results of previous cohort studies were not always consistent. Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the association between OH and mortality risk. Data source: Medline, Embase and references cited in related reviews and studies. Study selection: Cohort studies evaluating the association between OH and mortality risk were identified. Data extraction: Two investigators read all papers and extracted all relevant information. Results: A total of 56 125 subjects with 11 580 mortality cases from nine cohorts were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled results indicated that the presence of OH at baseline was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted risk ratio (RR) = 1.40, p<0.001). Subgroup analysis suggested that the association between OH and all-cause mortality was less strong for the studies in which classic risk factors were adequately adjusted compared with those in which they were not adequately controlled. In addition, although our meta-analysis failed to reveal a significant association between OH and cardiovascular (CV) mortality (RR=1.20, p=0.47), we did find that subjects with OH had an increased risk of non-CV mortality (RR=1.18, p=0.05). Conclusions: The presence of OH is associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, which may partially be mediated by classic risk factors. Further research is needed to determine whether the association between OH and mortality risk is causal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304121

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xin, W., Lin, Z., & Mi, S.
Affiliations
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
  • Guiyang Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Mi, Shuhua
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-07-22
Volume
100
Issue
5
Pages
406-413
ISSN
  • 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-201X
OpenAlex
W2137943562
Cited by
114
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Heart (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
orthostatic hypotension, mortality risk, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular risk factors, blood pressure
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Cause of Death, Humans, Hypotension, Orthostatic, Posture, Risk Factors, Global Health, Cohort Studies, Survival Rate, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review