Cited by 122

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Providencia, Rui, Elliott, Perry, Patel, Kiran, McCready, Jack, Babu, Girish, Srinivasan, Neil, Bronis, Kostantinos, Papageorgiou, Nikolaos, Chow, Anthony, Rowland, Edward, Lowe, Martin, Segal, Oliver R, Lambiase, Pier D·2016·Heart

Abstract

Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and is associated with a high risk of stroke. The efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in this setting is poorly characterised. We aimed to systematically review the existing literature and to perform a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HCM. Methods: Random-effects meta-analysis of studies comparing HCM versus non-HCM controls. The outcomes of freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia, and acute procedure-related complications were assessed. Studies were searched on MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE and clinicaltrials.gov. Results: Fourteen studies were considered eligible for the systematic review, of which five were included in the meta-analysis. Freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia relapse was higher in patients without HCM (after a single procedure: 38.7% HCM vs 49.8% controls, OR=2.25, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.64, p=0.03; after ≥1 procedure: 51.8% HCM vs 71.2% controls, OR=2.62, 95% CI 1.52 to 4.51, p=0.0006; I 2=33% and 26%, respectively). Risk of procedure-related adverse events was low. Repeat procedures (mean difference=0.16, 95% CI 0.0 to 0.32, p=0.05, I 2=53%) and antiarrhythmic drugs (OR=4.70, 95% CI 2.31 to 9.55, p<0.0001, I 2=0%) are more frequently needed in patients with HCM to prevent arrhythmia relapse. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the outcome in patients with HCM with less dilated atria and paroxysmal AF may be more comparable to the general population. Conclusions: The observed complication rate of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HCM was low. Even though the risk of relapse is twofold higher, catheter ablation can be effective in patients with HCM and AF, particularly in patients with paroxysmal AF and smaller atria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309406

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The overall success rate of ablation of atrial fibrillation in maintaining sinus rhythm without recurrence is lower in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy than those without it (39% v 50% for one procedure), but rates are similar for those with paroxysmal left ventricular and/or a non-dilated left atrium.

    “Although the overall success rate of ablation of atrial fibrillation in maintaining sinus rhythm without recurrence is lower in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy than those without it (39% v 50% for one procedure), rates are similar for those with paroxysmal left ventricular and/or a non-dilated left atrium.”

    From Current management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (2025) · cites this paper as [118]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1161/01.CIR.92.4.785 · DOI
  2. 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304276 · DOI
  3. 10.1161/hc4601.097997 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.022 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S0735-1097(10)80014-2 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/S0002-9149(84)80212-X · DOI
  7. 10.1159/000175883 · DOI
  8. 10.5588/ijtld.10.0719 · DOI
  9. 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.eupc.2005.05.015 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.11.013 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01192.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1093/europace/euq434 · DOI
  15. Derejko, 2013, Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: atrial fibrillation type determines the success rate, Kardiol Pol, 71, 17
  16. 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000339 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht307.102 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s10840-014-9894-y · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.063 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.07.005 · DOI
  21. 10.1253/circj.CJ-14-0823 · DOI
  22. 10.1253/circj.CJ-14-1290 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00390-8 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.011 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1136/hrt.77.2.130 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60397-3 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1161/01.CIR.91.5.1596 · DOI
  28. 10.1161/01.CIR.96.5.1686 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00941-0 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00596.x · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00529-Y · DOI
  32. 10.1161/01.RES.0000129579.59664.9d · DOI
  33. Gruver, 1999, Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation caused by Arg663His beta-cardiac myosin heavy chainmutation, Am J Cardiol, 83, 13H, 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00251-9 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s100380200021 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.stem.2012.10.010 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1161/01.CIR.71.2.234 · DOI
  37. 10.1161/01.RES.82.1.57 · DOI
  38. 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003019 · DOI
  39. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157153.30978.67 · DOI
  40. Zhao DS , Shen Y , Zhang Q , et al . Outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace 2015. doi:10.1093/europace/euv339 doi:10.1093/europace/euv339 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s10840-015-0047-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Providencia, R., Elliott, P., Patel, K., McCready, J., Babu, G., Srinivasan, N., Bronis, K., Papageorgiou, N., Chow, A., Rowland, E., Lowe, M., Segal, O. R., & Lambiase, P. D.
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-05-27
Volume
102
Issue
19
Pages
1533-1543
ISSN
  • 1355-6037
  • 1468-201X
Cited by
122
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review