108 Future cardiovascular disease risk for women with a history of gestational hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Introduction The risk of cardiovascular outcomes associated with gestational hypertension is unclear. This study aimed to quantify the association between gestational hypertension and cardiovascular outcomes for women. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Eligibility Criteria Studies examining the association between gestational hypertension and any cardiovascular outcome, including cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, stroke and heart failure. Two reviewers independently assessed the abstracts and full-text articles. Study characteristics and the relative risk of cardiovascular outcomes associated with gestational hypertension were extracted from eligible studies. Where appropriate, estimates were pooled with inverse variance weighted random-effects meta-analysis, and the absolute risk increases were calculated using the European population as a reference, as the majority of studies came from Europe. Results Nineteen studies involving 3,601,192 women (128,445 with gestational hypertension) were identified. A history of one or more pregnancies affected by gestational hypertension was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (12 studies, relative risk 1.73, 95% confidence interval: 1.43–2.08), coronary heart disease (8 studies, 1.56, 1.35–1.81) and heart failure (4 studies, 1.70, 1.43–2.02). (See Figure) There was also evidence for an increased risk of stroke (9 studies, 1.66, 0.99–2.80). Among the outcomes examined, the highest absolute risk increase was for cardiovascular disease: 14.0 events/1000 person-years. Associations between gestational hypertension and cardiovascular disease were broadly consistent across subgroups, although there was evidence that high quality studies with a low risk of bias had lower effect estimates. When analyses were restricted to high quality studies, an increased risk was found for all outcomes: cardiovascular disease, (1.53, 1.25–1.88); coronary heart disease, (1.40, 1.26–1.54); stroke, (1.35, 1.14–1.60); and heart failure, (1.70, 1.43–2.02). Conclusion Gestational hypertension is associated with an increased risk of overall cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, stroke and heart failure. Only two studies evaluated risk associated with the number of pregnancies affected by gestational hypertension, therefore more research is needed to assess the presence of a dose-response relationship. Conflict of Interest None
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A meta-analysis published beyond the time line of this review reported that women with gestational hypertension had an increased risk of composite cardiovascular disease (relative risk 1.73, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.09), stroke (1.66, 0.99 to 2.79), coronary heart disease (1.56, 1.35 to 1.81), and heart failure (1.70, 1.43 to 2.02).
“a meta-analysis,135 published beyond the time line of this review, which reported that women with gestational hypertension had an increased risk of composite cardiovascular disease (relative risk 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.43 to 2.09), stroke (1.66, 0.99 to 2.79), coronary heart disease (1.56, 1.35 to 1.81), and heart failure (1.70, 1.43 to 2.02)”
From Association between the reproductive health of young women and cardiovascular disease in later life: umbrella review (2020) · cites this paper as [135]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Okoth, K., Chandan, J. S., Marshall, T., Thangaratinam, S., Thomas, G. N., Nirantharakumar, K., & Adderley, N. J. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m3502 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Roth, H., Henry, A., Roberts, L., Hanley, L., & Homer, C. (2021) · BMC Women s Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-021-01524-w · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Roth, H., Morcos, V., Roberts, L. M., Hanley, L., Homer, C., & Henry, A. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055674 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Parry‐Smith, W., Šumilo, D., Subramanian, A., Gokhale, K. M., Okoth, K., Gallos, I. D., Coomarasamy, A., & Nirantharakumar, K. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041566 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Seid, A. K., Morken, N., Klungsøyr, K., Kvalvik, L. G., Sørbye, L. M., VATTEN, L. J., & Skjærven, R. (2023) · BMC Women s Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-023-02503-z · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Oliver-Williams, C., Lo, C., Lo, A., Hui, S., Fisher, G., Corker, B., Batho, O., Morris, B., Chowaniec, M., & Fraser, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Swavesey College
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Venue
- Stable IHD/Prevention/Hypertension/Lipids
- Published
- 2019-05
- Pages
- A89.1-A89
- OpenAlex
- W2980439375
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 19.53
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Keywords
- gestational hypertension, cardiovascular risk, coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, women's cardiovascular health, pregnancy complications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review