Sir James Mackenzie's heart
Open accessAbstract
The following description of Sir James Mackenzie's heart has been prepared in accordance with his desire, expressed to myself and to other friends, that after his death his heart should be examined to ascertain what information it furnished upon the symptoms that he had experienced.He died in London on January 25, 1925, aged 72.Some weeks before his death he told Dr. John Parkinson that he wished him to make a post-mortem examination.This request was confirmed, after his death, by his brother, Sir William Mackenzie, now Lord Amulree.The examination was performed, some fourteen hours after his death, by Dr. John Parkinson, assisted by Dr. J. W. Linnell.The heart was removed and subsequently sent to me at St. Andrews for further examination.Dr. Parkinson noted that nothing abnormal was found in the pericardium.In order to correlate the clinical symptoms with the pathological condition, it has been necessary to compile an account of Sir James Mackenzie's illness.This has not been easy for, like so many other doctors, he had not been under the care and observation of a medical man from the commencement of his illness.His own case is referred to both in his book on angina pectoris (Case No. 28) and in that on diseases of the heart, as well as in the Reports of the St. Andrews Institute.While he was in London, from 1908 to 1918, he mentioned to Sir Thomas Lewis that his anginal history began suddenly.While he was in St. Andrews, from 1918 to 1924, engaged in founding the Institute for Clinical Investigation which bears his name, he was on many occasions examined by Dr. James Orr, and discussed with him his condition.Dr. Orr also saw him during several of the attacks of angina, from which he suffered with increasing severity as the years went on.After his return to London in 1924 he was not under the care of any medical man until very shortly before his death, when he was seen by Dr. Parkinson and Dr. C. M. Anderson.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Framingham Heart Study was the first long-term study of its kind, except for Sir James Mackenzie's aborted attempt to follow St. Andrews residents.
“The Framingham Heart Study was the first long-term study of its kind, with the exception of Sir James Mackenzie's aborted attempt to longitudinally follow the health status of St. Andrews, Scotland residents.21”
From The Framingham Heart Study and the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease: a historical perspective (2014) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- FIG. l.-Section of the wall of the left ventricle near the apex, showing a recent small hxmor- rhagic infarction, involving the deeper part ofthe muscle wall, covered by a nodular reddish- brown mass of clot, the size of a cherry-stone, projecting into the cavity of the ventricle. on July 14, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://heart.bmj.com/ Br Heart J: first published as 10.1136/hrt.1.3.237 on 1 July 1939. Downloaded from REFERENCES
- --(1922). Reports of the St. Andrews Institute for Clinical Research, London, i, 67. on July 14, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://heart.bmj.com/ Br Heart J: first published as 10.1136/hrt.1.3.237 on 1 July 1939. Downloaded from
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Framingham Heart Study and the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease: a historical perspective
Mahmood, S. S., Levy, D., Vasan, R. S., & Wang, T. J. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61752-3 · Cited by 1,622 · see citing works
- Authors
- Waterston, D., Orr, J., & Cappell, D. F.
- Affiliations
- University of St Andrews (GB)
- Venue
- Heart
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1939-07-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-248
- ISSN
- 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC503856
- OpenAlex
- W1991807378
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Heart (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Innovations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Keywords
- angina pectoris, cardiac pathology, James Orr, John Parkinson
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review