The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outcome of isolated congenital complete heart block diagnosed in utero.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To establish identifiable prenatal factors in fetal heart block which might predict death in utero, the need for intervention, or the probability of pacemaker requirement. SETTING: Tertiary referral unit for fetal echocardiography. SUBJECTS: 36 fetuses with congenital complete heart block and structurally normal hearts identified between 1980 and 1993. METHODS: Maternal anti-Ro antibody status was documented. Prenatal variables examined included absolute heart (ventricular) rate, change in rate, and development of hydrops fetalis. Postnatally, heart rate, need for pacing, and the indications for pacing were detailed. RESULTS: Of the total of 36 patients, there are 24 survivors; 11 are paced. Of those fetuses which died, two were electively aborted for severe hydrops, seven died in utero, two were immediate postnatal deaths, and one was an unrelated infant death. The trend was for the heart rate to decrease during fetal life and postnatally. Fetuses with deteriorating cardiac function did not always show the lowest heart rates. Bradycardia of less than 55 beats/min in early pregnancy or rapid decrease in heart rate prenatally were poor prognostic signs. Hydrops was also associated with bad outcome, 10 out of the 12 hydropic fetuses dying (83%). Of 10 fetuses presenting with a heart rate above 60/min, nine survived of whom three required pacing. Of seven presenting with heart rates of 50/min or less, only three survived and two of these required pacing. Of the two fetuses with negative maternal anti-Ro antibody status one died in utero and one required heart transplantation after pacemaker insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated complete heart block identified in fetal life does not always have a good prognosis. An individual heart rate does not accurately predict the outcome in utero or the need for postnatal pacing. Regular, careful monitoring during pregnancy is required in order to optimise care and timing of any interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jaeggi, E. T., Hamilton, R. M., Silverman, E. D., Zamora, S. A., & Hornberger, L. K. (2002) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01697-7 · Cited by 420
Guidelines for fetal echocardiography
Satomi, G. (2015) · Pediatrics International · doi:10.1111/ped.12467 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Groves, A. M., Allan, L. D., & Rosenthal, E.
- Venue
- Heart
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 190-194
- ISSN
- 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-201X
- OpenAlex
- W2070247055
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcome of isolated congenital complete heart block diagnosed in utero. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/hrt.75.2.190
- The paper
- Groves, A. M., Allan, L. D., & Rosenthal, E. (1996). Outcome of isolated congenital complete heart block diagnosed in utero. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.75.2.190
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.